ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] DAG4

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] DAG4
  • From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:58:54 -0500

i'd like to get these remaining issues hammered out before the call if 
possible.  my goal for the call is short, boring, no debates.  



On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Can we discuss on the call today?  Have not had time to focus on this yet and 
> frankly trying to catch up on everything non-VI related.
>  
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
>  
>  
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:57 AM
> To: briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] DAG4
>  
> anybody have a problem with this?  
>  
> i'll assume this is OK unless i hear otherwise...
>  
> mikey
>  
>  
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Brian Cute wrote:
> 
> 
> I commend the drafters (primarily RT and JN I believe) for their good attempt 
> to interpret the meaning and potential implication of DAG4.  I think it needs 
> to be made explicit that individual members of the VIWG don’t necessarily 
> adhere to this interpretation since it remains unclear what implementation of 
> DAG4 would look like if that’s what the final policy became.  Could a phrase 
> to that effect be added to the text?  “nor do all individual members of the 
> VIWG adhere to this interpretation.”
>  
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone    651-647-6109  
> fax                          866-280-2356  
> web        http://www.haven2.com
> handle   OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, 
> etc.)
>  

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy