RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

[Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If the WDC Consultation was the Washington DC (WDC?) meeting, yes I was there 
but do not remember the subject of harms being discussed. I do not know how it 
could be on this list since the Washington DC meeting was in January and this 
Working Group did not begin till after Nairobi.

Maybe someone from Staff could send out to the list the frank discussion of 
harms that Eric has mentioned. It would give the group a great start on our 
harms report


Thanks

Jeff Eckhaus

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Brunner-Williams [mailto:ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 2:29 PM
To: Jeff Eckhaus
Cc: 'Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

Jeff,

As I mentioned, I was repeating prior contribution to the list.

I don't recall if you were present at the January WDC Consultation, but several 
of us were, and the subject of harms was discussed by Staff quite frankly.

Staff's views on the subject and on structural separation as a tool are present 
in the Staff instructions to CRAI, which I obtained through the Documentary 
Information Disclosure Policy on May 28th.

This has all been posted previously, sorry you missed it.

Eric

Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc. 
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended 
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and 
then delete it from your system. Thank you.