RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried
- To: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:32:11 -0400
Just want to chime in that I have not been paying attention to this list at
MAPO, beginning of school semester, IGF...lotsa stuff going on
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Antony Van Couvering
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 2:25 PM
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried
> I agree with Avri, and the MAPO issue is taking time too.
> The list of harms is a laundry list, and earlier attempts to set up a
> framework for assigning probability and risk to the possible harms was
> not welcomed by some in the group. So we are left with a list of
> terrible things that could maybe happen, and generally there is no
> disagreement that they would be terrible things, if they happened.
> Are they likely to happen? Will it matter if they do happen? Who knows
> -- prioritization and probability analysis seem to be off-limits.
> On Sep 20, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I would also add that perhaps we are not all as concerned about
> perfecting the list of possible harms as some of the other issues that
> may still be on the plate (whatever they are). For example since at
> this point it was just a laundry list of everyone's possible worry that
> was not being to be prioritized or really analyzed in any way, it was
> not something I had a whole lot of opinion on.
> > a.
> > On 20 Sep 2010, at 13:03, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> >> I'd add another bullet, which is the one that applies to me: So busy
> at the jobs that pay us that we haven't been able to be as active as we
> were in the summer.
> >> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roberto Gaetano
> >> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:28 PM
> >> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried
> >> I am getting increasingly worried.
> >> The list is very quiet, while Labor Day is already behind us.
> >> How shall I interpret this silence?
> >> * Are we waiting for something to happen at the Board retreat?
> >> * Are we unclear on where to go next?
> >> * Are we tired after the "tour de force" of the last months?
> >> * Are we happy with the result so far and/or we believe that we
> cannot go any further?
> >> * Is there anything that people know about developments on this
> subject that I am not aware of, and that leads us to think that it is
> not worthed to go further?
> >> I don't want to change the plans for today's agenda, but it seems to
> me that we should dedicate a few minutes on this call to poll (in the
> figured sense) the audience on opinions on the way forward.
> >> What do people think?
> >> Cheers,
> >> Roberto