RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

Just want to chime in that I have not been paying attention to this list at 
all. 
MAPO, beginning of school semester, IGF...lotsa stuff going on

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Antony Van Couvering
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 2:25 PM
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried
> 
> 
> Roberto,
> 
> I agree with Avri, and the MAPO issue is taking time too.
> 
> The list of harms is a laundry list, and earlier attempts to set up a
> framework for assigning probability and risk to the possible harms was
> not welcomed by some in the group.  So we are left with a list of
> terrible things that could maybe happen, and generally there is no
> disagreement that they would be terrible things, if they happened.
> 
> Are they likely to happen?  Will it matter if they do happen?  Who knows
> -- prioritization and probability analysis seem to be off-limits.
> 
> Antony
> 
> On Sep 20, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would also add that perhaps we are not all as concerned about
> perfecting the list of possible harms as some of the other issues that
> may still be on the plate (whatever they are).  For example since at
> this point it was just a laundry list of everyone's possible worry that
> was not being to be prioritized or really analyzed in any way, it was
> not something I had a whole lot of opinion on.
> >
> > a.
> >
> > On 20 Sep 2010, at 13:03, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> >
> >> I'd add another bullet, which is the one that applies to me:  So busy
> at the jobs that pay us that we haven't been able to be as active as we
> were in the summer.
> >>
> >> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roberto Gaetano
> >> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 12:28 PM
> >> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Worried
> >>
> >> I am getting increasingly worried.
> >> The list is very quiet, while Labor Day is already behind us.
> >> How shall I interpret this silence?
> >>
> >>    * Are we waiting for something to happen at the Board retreat?
> >>    * Are we unclear on where to go next?
> >>    * Are we tired after the "tour de force" of the last months?
> >>    * Are we happy with the result so far and/or we believe that we
> cannot go any further?
> >>    * Is there anything that people know about developments on this
> subject that I am not aware of, and that leads us to think that it is
> not worthed to go further?
> >> I don't want to change the plans for today's agenda, but it seems to
> me that we should dedicate a few minutes on this call to poll (in the
> figured sense) the audience on opinions on the way forward.
> >>
> >> What do people think?
> >> Cheers,
> >> Roberto
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>