[gnso-whois-study] [Fwd: FW: Study Proposals]

["GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

FYI
From: Eulgen, Lee J.
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 3:27 PM
To: Liz Gasster
Subject: Study Proposals

Liz -

Thanks again to you and Glen for organizing last Wednesday's call.

While I will save extended commentary for our call tomorrow, here is my 
ranking of the studies before us.  In my view, all seven categories of 
proposed study would be worth pursuing and, hence, the rankings below 
include my order of preference within each of the seven categories:

WHOIS Misuse Studies

Study 15

Study 1

Study 14

I don't think that Study 21 is worth undertaking


Compliance with Data Protection Laws

Study 24

Studies 16, 22, and 23 should somehow be combined


Availability of Privacy Services

Study 2

I don't think that Study 5 is worth undertaking


Demand and Motivation for Use of Privacy Services

Studies 18 and 19 could perhaps be combined

Study 17


Impact of Whois Data Protection on Crime and Abuse

Study 13

I don't think that Study 6 is worth undertaking


Proxy Registrar Compliance

Perhaps the timeliness aspects of Studies 3 and 20 can be combined

Metalitz comment

Study 12


Whois Data Accuracy

Study 8

I don't think that Study 11 is worth undertaking


I look forward to hearing where others have come out.  As always, if you 
have questions, do not hesitate to let me know.

Lee



Lee J. Eulgen
Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
2 N. LaSalle St., Suite 2300
Chicago, Illinois  60602-3801
312.269.8465
312.578.2807 (facsimile)
leulgen@xxxxxxxxxx

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE

This communication is confidential and may contain privileged 
information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender 
by reply e-mail and immediately delete it and any attachments without 
copying or further transmitting the same.


--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org