RE: [gnso-whois-study] Updated hypotheses attached

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Liz.  I very much appreciate the quick turnaround on this.
 
For those not on today's call, please note that we agreed to quickly
review the work done today and provide any comments to this list within
3-4 hours after our call ended.  That will allow Liz to finalize all the
hypotheses for sending to the proposer of the respective studies for
their possible comment.  Note that Liz's document highlights the work
done in our meeting today so it is easy to review today's work.  For
easy reference, see the following areas of the table: Area 1 - GAC 3;
Area 7 - GAC 4, GAC 5 and GAC 6.  Finally, note that Area 8 was deleted
because the four items were incorporated in other areas.
 
Let me start the comment process on today's work by suggesting a minor
edit to the text for GAC 5 and GAC 6.  Because there are essentially two
hypotheses for each of these, albeit hypotheses that are related, I
think the parenthetical statements in both cases should say: "(These
hypotheses could be combined with GAC 6.)" 
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
        Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:32 PM
        To: gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-whois-study] Updated hypotheses attached 
        
        

        All,

         

        Attached please find the updated hypotheses based on today's
discussion.  They have also been updated on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/whois-hypoth-wg/index.cgi?whois_hypotheses_wg

         

        Please let me know ASAP if you have any corrections or concerns.
As promised, later today I will be reaching out to each of those who
submitted hypotheses to solicit their comments/ concerns to our restated
versions.  

         

        Thanks, Liz