<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Last few questions
- To: "'Whois Survey WG'" <gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Last few questions
- From: "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:22:00 -0700
Hi Don,
I incorporated most of your changes. I do have a few questions.......
<<<<See response below
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
@berrycobb
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don Blumenthal
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 09:08
To: Whois Survey WG
Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Last few questions
Based on an experience that I just had when returning to the questionnaire,
we should have language asking people to click Resume Later if they take a
break. I timed out. Also stress to use the Previous button instead of the
back page.
<<<<I added text in the Welcome screen now. Wilson and I are
troubleshooting an error when using the Resume Later Function. We cannot go
live until this gets fixed.
Another general note. i.e. And e.g. should be italicized throughout.
I went back to look at Requirement descriptions and recheck one question
Descriptions
R3 - space between query and (question) at the end of the italicized
section.
R6a - To evolve from rather than to be evolved from
R7 - US7ASCII issue that I raised before
Recheck
R5 - is it necessary to force an answer to the data element ranking?
<<<<Wilson will reload the logic to this question. I accidently deleted the
section and I had to recreate from scratch.
Onward
R8.1
Description - Elavated should be elevated in italicized section Is there a
problem with saying that the rate limiting is necessary in the description
but then asking a question about it at the end of the section?
<<<<What do you proposed we change?
Capitalize first words in explanations
Preferred approach - space between verified and while Also, "by which WHOIS
users identify"
R8.2
Extraneous space at the start of the second parenthetical in the
description?
R8.3
Auditable metrics - is there an extraneous space between ( and For?
I don't see an R9
R10 - thick WHOIS
Start of description. All new TLDs should. Doesn't that beg a question in
the section?
<<<<What do you propose we change?
R10 - WHOWAS
Explanation - Can we split the first sentence? It got hard to follow. At the
least, put a comma between name and which.
Also, insert a space after time. and before A and between WHOWAS and
service.
R11
Explanation - "alternately" should start a new sentence.
How would POC be valuable - is there an extraneous empty line at the top of
the question?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|