ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-whoissurvey-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Last few questions

  • To: "'Whois Survey WG'" <gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Last few questions
  • From: "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:22:00 -0700

Hi Don,

 

I incorporated most of your changes.  I do have a few questions.......

 

<<<<See response below

 

Berry Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

720.839.5735

mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

@berrycobb

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whoissurvey-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don Blumenthal
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 09:08
To: Whois Survey WG
Subject: [gnso-whoissurvey-dt] Last few questions

 

 

Based on an experience that I just had when returning to the questionnaire,
we should have language asking people to click Resume Later if they take a
break. I timed out. Also stress to use the Previous button instead of the
back page.

 

 

<<<<I added text in the Welcome screen now.  Wilson and I are
troubleshooting an error when using the Resume Later Function.  We cannot go
live until this gets fixed.

 

Another general note. i.e. And e.g. should be italicized throughout.

 

I went back to look at Requirement descriptions and recheck one question
Descriptions

R3 - space between query and (question) at the end of the italicized
section.

 

R6a - To evolve from rather than to be evolved from

 

R7 - US7ASCII issue that I raised before

 

Recheck

R5 - is it necessary to force an answer to the data element ranking?

 

<<<<Wilson will reload the logic to this question.  I accidently deleted the
section and I had to recreate from scratch.

 

Onward

R8.1

Description - Elavated should be elevated in italicized section Is there a
problem with saying that the rate limiting is necessary in the description
but then asking a question about it at the end of the section?

 

<<<<What do you proposed we change?

 

Capitalize first words in explanations

Preferred approach - space between verified and while Also, "by which WHOIS
users identify"

 

R8.2

Extraneous space at the start of the second parenthetical in the
description?

 

R8.3

Auditable metrics - is there an extraneous space between ( and For?

 

I don't see an R9

 

R10 - thick WHOIS

Start of description. All new TLDs should. Doesn't that beg a question in
the section?

 

<<<<What do you propose we change?

 

R10 - WHOWAS

Explanation - Can we split the first sentence? It got hard to follow. At the
least, put a comma between name and which.

Also, insert a space after time. and before A and between WHOWAS and
service.

 

R11

Explanation - "alternately" should start a new sentence.

How would POC be valuable - is there an extraneous empty line at the top of
the question?

 

 

 

 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy