RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution and Timeline--REVISED

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I could make a meeting on Monday but probably not on Tuesday.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
        Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 11:29 AM
        To: Ken Bour
        Cc: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution and 
Timeline--REVISED
        
        
        Thanks Ken for drafting the motion and thanks Chuck for your comments.
        I like the way it is written and also that it includes the timeline in 
the text.
        No news from Wolf on the list and as a response to my email. 
        So the idea is that at the end of today´s afternoon I can send the 
letter and document to the GNSO list and we wait until Monday for sending the 
motion and see if we need a meeting on Tuesday.
        Let me know if I am missing something.
        Best regards
        Olga
        
        
        2010/4/9 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        

                WPM Team Members:

                 

                The DRAFT Resolution, below, now incorporates the suggestions 
made by Chuck and a few additional tweaks of my own after a few additional 
rereads.   The timeline is the same as my first version.  

                 

                Concerning format, how should we connect the Timeline to the 
Resolution?    Can it be tacked to the bottom of the resolution as I am showing 
with an embedded reference "(see below)"?  

                 

                Any thoughts about having our teleconference on Monday, as 
scheduled, to finalize the resolution and timeline?  

                 

                Thanks,

                 

                Ken

                ===

                 

                RESOLUTION:

                 

                WHEREAS, the ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the 
GNSO Council a 2008-2009 Work Team Attendance Study which confirmed that 
volunteer participation has been suffering and languishing; 

                 

                WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, considering the advice of Staff, 
organized a Drafting Team at the Seoul ICANN meeting for the purpose of 
developing a GNSO Work Prioritization model and procedure; 

                 

                WHEREAS, the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT) 
has completed its deliberations and developed a written procedure recommended 
for inclusion in the GNSO Operating Procedures as Section 6 plus an 
accompanying ANNEX (link TBD); 

                 

                WHEREAS, the WPM-DT has developed a timeline of activities (see 
below) that it recommends be adopted in order that the first Work 
Prioritization effort can be completed by the ICANN Brussels meeting; 

                 

                NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

                 

                RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts the deliverable of the 
WPM-DT, thanks the team for its efforts, and approves the use of Section 6 and 
the ANNEX (link TBD) for conducting its first Work Prioritization effort.  

                 

                RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to 
commence a twenty-one (21) day public comment period on this amendment to the 
GNSO Operating Procedures and reserves the right to modify the procedures 
described in Section 6 and the ANNEX after the conclusion of both the public 
comment period and the first Work Prioritization effort. 

                 

                RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council supports the 
recommended timeline (see below) for conducting the first Work Prioritization 
effort and directs the GNSO Secretariat to make arrangements consistent with 
its dates and activities.  

                 

                RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council take action on Section 
6 and the ANNEX with regard to the GNSO Operating Procedures as soon as 
possible after completion and analysis of the first Work Prioritization effort. 

                 

                TIMELINE FOR FIRST WORK PRIORITIZATION EFFORT

                 

Dates

Activities (per proposed ANNEX to Section 6)

26-30 April

ANNEX Step 1:  Staff to prepare recommendations for Eligible and Non-Eligible 
Projects and associated classifications

3-12 May

 

Chair asks for Council approval (via email list) to adopt or modify Staff's 
recommendations (complete 8 days in advance of Council meeting)

20 May Council Meeting

Eligible Projects List approved by Council

21-31 May

ANNEX Step 2:   Individual Councilor ratings completed (10 calendar days)

1-11 June

ANNEX Step 2.3:  Staff consolidates ratings and analyzes for commonality; 
prepares for Step 3.  

19 June (or 20 June)

ANNEX Step 3:   Group Session (2 hours) to determine Value ratings

Brussels Council Meeting

ANNEX Step 4:   Approve final ratings/priorities and direct that results be 
published at gnso.icann.org.