RES: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution and Timeline--REVISED
- To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Olga Cavalli'" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Ken Bour'" <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RES: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution and Timeline--REVISED
- From: "Jaime B Wagner" <j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:52:52 -0300
I?m scheduled for Monday at 1400 UTC
De: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Gomes, Chuck
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 9 de abril de 2010 15:36
Para: Olga Cavalli; Ken Bour
Assunto: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution and
I could make a meeting on Monday but probably not on Tuesday.
From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 11:29 AM
To: Ken Bour
Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution and
Thanks Ken for drafting the motion and thanks Chuck for your comments.
I like the way it is written and also that it includes the timeline in the
No news from Wolf on the list and as a response to my email.
So the idea is that at the end of today´s afternoon I can send the letter
and document to the GNSO list and we wait until Monday for sending the
motion and see if we need a meeting on Tuesday.
Let me know if I am missing something.
2010/4/9 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
WPM Team Members:
The DRAFT Resolution, below, now incorporates the suggestions made by Chuck
and a few additional tweaks of my own after a few additional rereads. The
timeline is the same as my first version.
Concerning format, how should we connect the Timeline to the Resolution?
Can it be tacked to the bottom of the resolution as I am showing with an
embedded reference ?(see below)??
Any thoughts about having our teleconference on Monday, as scheduled, to
finalize the resolution and timeline?
WHEREAS, the ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO Council a
2008-2009 Work Team Attendance Study which confirmed that volunteer
participation has been suffering and languishing;
WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, considering the advice of Staff, organized a
Drafting Team at the Seoul ICANN meeting for the purpose of developing a
GNSO Work Prioritization model and procedure;
WHEREAS, the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT) has completed
its deliberations and developed a written procedure recommended for
inclusion in the GNSO Operating Procedures as Section 6 plus an accompanying
ANNEX (link TBD);
WHEREAS, the WPM-DT has developed a timeline of activities (see below) that
it recommends be adopted in order that the first Work Prioritization effort
can be completed by the ICANN Brussels meeting;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts the deliverable of the WPM-DT,
thanks the team for its efforts, and approves the use of Section 6 and the
ANNEX (link TBD) for conducting its first Work Prioritization effort.
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to commence a
twenty-one (21) day public comment period on this amendment to the GNSO
Operating Procedures and reserves the right to modify the procedures
described in Section 6 and the ANNEX after the conclusion of both the public
comment period and the first Work Prioritization effort.
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council supports the recommended timeline
(see below) for conducting the first Work Prioritization effort and directs
the GNSO Secretariat to make arrangements consistent with its dates and
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council take action on Section 6 and the
ANNEX with regard to the GNSO Operating Procedures as soon as possible after
completion and analysis of the first Work Prioritization effort.
TIMELINE FOR FIRST WORK PRIORITIZATION EFFORT
Activities (per proposed ANNEX to Section 6)
ANNEX Step 1: Staff to prepare recommendations for Eligible and
Non-Eligible Projects and associated classifications
Chair asks for Council approval (via email list) to adopt or modify Staff?s
recommendations (complete 8 days in advance of Council meeting)
20 May Council Meeting
Eligible Projects List approved by Council
ANNEX Step 2: Individual Councilor ratings completed (10 calendar days)
ANNEX Step 2.3: Staff consolidates ratings and analyzes for commonality;
prepares for Step 3.
19 June (or 20 June)
ANNEX Step 3: Group Session (2 hours) to determine Value ratings
Brussels Council Meeting
ANNEX Step 4: Approve final ratings/priorities and direct that results be
published at gnso.icann.org.