Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution and Timeline--REVISED

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
I am ok with both Monday or Tuesday.
Later today I will send document and letter to the GNSO list, unless someone
express something in contrary.
Regards
Olga


2010/4/9 Jaime B Wagner <j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  I’m scheduled for Monday at 1400 UTC
>
>
>
> Jaime Wagner
> j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> cel: +55(51)8126-0916
>
>
>
> *De:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *Em
> nome de *Gomes, Chuck
> *Enviada em:* sexta-feira, 9 de abril de 2010 15:36
> *Para:* Olga Cavalli; Ken Bour
>
> *Cc:* gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Assunto:* RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution and
> Timeline--REVISED
>
>
>
> I could make a meeting on Monday but probably not on Tuesday.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
> *Sent:* Friday, April 09, 2010 11:29 AM
> *To:* Ken Bour
> *Cc:* gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: Draft Council Resolution and
> Timeline--REVISED
>
> Thanks Ken for drafting the motion and thanks Chuck for your comments.
> I like the way it is written and also that it includes the timeline in the
> text.
> No news from Wolf on the list and as a response to my email.
> So the idea is that at the end of today´s afternoon I can send the letter
> and document to the GNSO list and we wait until Monday for sending the
> motion and see if we need a meeting on Tuesday.
> Let me know if I am missing something.
> Best regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/4/9 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> WPM Team Members:
>
>
>
> The DRAFT Resolution, below, now incorporates the suggestions made by Chuck
> and a few additional tweaks of my own after a few additional rereads.   The
> timeline is the same as my first version.
>
>
>
> Concerning format, how should we connect the Timeline to the Resolution?
> Can it be tacked to the bottom of the resolution as I am showing with an
> embedded reference “(see below)”?
>
>
>
> Any thoughts about having our teleconference on Monday, as scheduled, to
> finalize the resolution and timeline?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ken
>
> ===
>
>
>
> *RESOLUTION:*
>
>
>
> WHEREAS, the ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO Council
> a 2008-2009 Work Team Attendance Study which confirmed that volunteer
> participation has been suffering and languishing;
>
>
>
> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, considering the advice of Staff, organized a
> Drafting Team at the Seoul ICANN meeting for the purpose of developing a
> GNSO Work Prioritization model and procedure;
>
>
>
> WHEREAS, the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT) has completed
> its deliberations and developed a written procedure recommended for
> inclusion in the GNSO Operating Procedures as Section 6 plus an accompanying
> ANNEX (link TBD);
>
>
>
> WHEREAS, the WPM-DT has developed a timeline of activities (see below) that
> it recommends be adopted in order that the first Work Prioritization effort
> can be completed by the ICANN Brussels meeting;
>
>
>
> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
>
>
>
> RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts the deliverable of the WPM-DT,
> thanks the team for its efforts, and approves the use of Section 6 and the
> ANNEX (link TBD) for conducting its first Work Prioritization effort.
>
>
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to commence a
> twenty-one (21) day public comment period on this amendment to the GNSO
> Operating Procedures and reserves the right to modify the procedures
> described in Section 6 and the ANNEX after the conclusion of both the public
> comment period and the first Work Prioritization effort.
>
>
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council supports the recommended timeline
> (see below) for conducting the first Work Prioritization effort and directs
> the GNSO Secretariat to make arrangements consistent with its dates and
> activities.
>
>
>
> RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council take action on Section 6 and the
> ANNEX with regard to the GNSO Operating Procedures as soon as possible after
> completion and analysis of the first Work Prioritization effort.
>
>
>
> *TIMELINE FOR FIRST WORK PRIORITIZATION EFFORT*
>
>
>
> *Dates*
>
> *Activities (per proposed ANNEX to Section 6)*
>
> 26-30 April
>
> ANNEX Step 1:  Staff to prepare recommendations for Eligible and
> Non-Eligible Projects and associated classifications
>
> 3-12 May
>
>
>
> Chair asks for Council approval (via email list) to adopt or modify Staff’s
> recommendations (complete 8 days in advance of Council meeting)
>
> 20 May Council Meeting
>
> Eligible Projects List approved by Council
>
> 21-31 May
>
> ANNEX Step 2:   Individual Councilor ratings completed (10 calendar days)
>
> 1-11 June
>
> ANNEX Step 2.3:  Staff consolidates ratings and analyzes for commonality;
> prepares for Step 3.
>
> 19 June (or 20 June)
>
> ANNEX Step 3:   Group Session (2 hours) to determine Value ratings
>
> Brussels Council Meeting
>
> ANNEX Step 4:   Approve final ratings/priorities and direct that results be
> published at gnso.icann.org.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>