[gnso-wpm-dt] Slides for council meeting on Wednesday
Chuck & WPM Members: Attached is KBv2 of the slide deck for the GNSO Council Meeting this Wednesday. Slide changes made (#1, #3, and #8 - no changes): . #2 - WPM-DT Effort: changed the title and agree it should be a brief refresher to set context . #4 - Councilor Questions: moved up in sequence because it seems like next logical slide in the flow . #5 - Proposed Resolution: new slide covering only the 4-part RESOLVED portion (edited and trimmed) . #6 - Timeline: same content, but no longer hidden . #7 - Recommendations: new title; 1st bullet new (to cover Chuck's last comment); 2nd bullet retained to address managerial role issues which, I think, should be noted so that Council is clear that WP is only the FIRST part of a longer term process. Additional comments? Ken P.S. The full Resolution is still in the deck, but it's now Slide #9 (after Questions) and hidden -- just in case you need it. From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 3:10 PM To: Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx Cc: Olga Cavalli Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Slides for council meeting on Wednesday Thanks for the quick response Ken. My personal opinion is that the slides should focus more directly on what we asking Council to approve in the motion rather than on the work of the DT. The motion itself probably is not needed in the slides but a slide containing a brief listing of the four parts of the resolution would be very helpful. After that the timeline slide would naturally follow. And then the slide with the two questions. I am not sure that slide 2 is needed but if it remains I would suggest covering it very quickly. Slide 3 is a good summary of the deliverable but I think it can be covered fairly quickly. I also think we need a slide toward the end that makes it very clear that approval of the motion only means approval of the first prioritization excercize and that, after that, we will review and improve the process and approve the additions to the GNSO Operating Procedures. Chuck _____ From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Bour Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:45 PM To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx Cc: 'Olga Cavalli' Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] Slides for council meeting on Wednesday Olga & WPM Team: Attached is a DRAFT set of slides proposed for the GNSO Council session on Wednesday. I wasn't sure how much information you might want to convey, so I based the content primarily on the key portions of the transmittal letter and resolution. At present, there are 8 total slides two of which, Resolution and Timeline, are marked "hidden" - available only if needed. Slides 1 and 7 are bookends, which leaves 4 main content slides that should only take 5 minutes or so to present. I did add a slide to address the two Councilor questions that occurred on the email list. I am happy to make any additional changes that you would like. Ken P.S. I have been invited to attend the Council session and am planning to do so. From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 11:19 AM To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx Cc: Ken Bour; Olga Cavalli Subject: Slides for council meeting on Wednesday Hi, during the preparation of the meeting on Wednesday, we decided to present the prioritization process with some slides. It should not be a long presentation, rather short (5 minutes...) and then have time for discussion and hopefully move forward with the motion after that. Ken, could you help me preparing the slides? I can present the during the call and you and others in the team can add comments if needed. We shoul addreess the concerns that were rised in the GNSO email list. Any comments or suggestions are welcome. Regards Olga Attachment:
WPM Council Presentation (KBv2-21 April 2010).ppt
|