ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-wpm-dt] RE: Slides for council meeting on Wednesday

  • To: "Ken Bour" <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] RE: Slides for council meeting on Wednesday
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:10:39 -0400

This looks good to me but I do have one more suggestion.  If it can be
done easily, it would be helpful if some estimated target timeframes
were included on slide 7 so as to give Councilors some perspective when
the various actions would happen, something along the line of what I did
in the attached slide.


        From: Ken Bour [mailto:ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 4:27 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Cc: 'Olga Cavalli'
        Subject: Slides for council meeting on Wednesday

        Chuck & WPM Members:


        Attached is KBv2 of the slide deck for the GNSO Council Meeting
this Wednesday.  


        Slide changes made (#1, #3, and #8 - no changes):


        *         #2 - WPM-DT Effort:  changed the title and agree it
should be a brief refresher to set context

        *         #4 - Councilor Questions:  moved up in sequence
because it seems like next logical slide in the flow

        *         #5 - Proposed Resolution:  new slide covering only the
4-part RESOLVED portion (edited and trimmed)

        *         #6 - Timeline:  same content, but no longer hidden

        *         #7 - Recommendations:  new title; 1st bullet new (to
cover Chuck's last comment); 2nd bullet retained to address managerial
role issues which, I think, should be noted so that Council is clear
that WP is only the FIRST part of a longer term process.  


        Additional comments?




        P.S.  The full Resolution is still in the deck, but it's now
Slide #9 (after Questions) and hidden  -- just in case you need it.  


        From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 3:10 PM
        To: Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Cc: Olga Cavalli
        Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Slides for council meeting on


        Thanks for the quick response Ken.  My personal opinion is that
the slides should focus more directly on what we asking Council to
approve in the motion rather than on the work of the DT.  The motion
itself probably is not needed in the slides but a slide containing a
brief listing of the four parts of the resolution would be very helpful.
After that the timeline slide would naturally follow.  And then the
slide with the two questions.


        I am not sure that slide 2 is needed but if it remains I would
suggest covering it very quickly.  Slide 3 is a good summary of the
deliverable but I think it can be covered fairly quickly.


        I also think we need a slide toward the end that makes it very
clear that approval of the motion only means approval of the first
prioritization excercize and that, after that, we will review and
improve the process and approve the additions to the GNSO Operating





                From: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Bour
                Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:45 PM
                To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
                Cc: 'Olga Cavalli'
                Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] Slides for council meeting on

                Olga & WPM Team:


                Attached is a DRAFT set of slides proposed for the GNSO
Council session on Wednesday.   I wasn't sure how much information you
might want to convey, so I based the content primarily on the key
portions of the transmittal letter and resolution.   At present, there
are 8 total slides two of which,  Resolution and Timeline, are marked
"hidden" - available only if needed.   Slides 1 and 7 are bookends,
which leaves 4 main content slides that should only take 5 minutes or so
to present.   I did add a slide to address the two Councilor questions
that occurred on the email list.  


                I am happy to make any additional changes that you would




                P.S.   I have been invited to attend the Council session
and am planning to do so.  



                From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 11:19 AM
                To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
                Cc: Ken Bour; Olga Cavalli
                Subject: Slides for council meeting on Wednesday


                during the preparation of the meeting on Wednesday, we
decided to present the prioritization process with some slides.
                It should not be a long presentation, rather short (5
minutes...) and then have time for discussion and hopefully move forward
with the motion after that.
                Ken, could you help me preparing the slides? I can
present the during the call and you and others in the team can add
comments if needed.
                We shoul addreess  the concerns that were rised in the
GNSO email list.
                Any comments or suggestions are welcome.

Attachment: Prioritization Slide 7.ppt
Description: Prioritization Slide 7.ppt

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy