Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] RE: Slides for council meeting on Wednesday

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Ken, I agree with Chuck that it is ready.
Good Job.
Dont worry about the template,must be my computer.
Regards
Olga

2010/4/19 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Olga & Chuck:
>
>
>
> This next version (KBv3) accommodates Chuck’s most recent suggestion.
>
>
>
> Also, I dropped Slide #2 (now hidden at the end) and added a new slide to
> outline the ANNEX steps in more detail per Olga’s request.   These are the
> steps that would occur for the 1st prioritization effort that are also
> listed in the timeline.
>
>
>
> I don’t understand, Olga, what you mean about the template and difficulty
> reading the last line.   The slides appear perfectly on my computer.   This
> time, I attached a version as a PDF in case we are experiencing difficulties
> between platforms and/or SW versions.   Please let me know if it looks OK…
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 6:11 PM
>
> *To:* Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* Olga Cavalli
> *Subject:* RE: Slides for council meeting on Wednesday
>
>
>
> This looks good to me but I do have one more suggestion.  If it can be done
> easily, it would be helpful if some estimated target timeframes were
> included on slide 7 so as to give Councilors some perspective when the
> various actions would happen, something along the line of what I did in the
> attached slide.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Ken Bour [mailto:ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 4:27 PM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* 'Olga Cavalli'
> *Subject:* Slides for council meeting on Wednesday
>
> Chuck & WPM Members:
>
>
>
> Attached is KBv2 of the slide deck for the GNSO Council Meeting this
> Wednesday.
>
>
>
> Slide changes made (#1, #3, and #8 – no changes):
>
>
>
> ·         #2 - WPM-DT Effort:  changed the title and agree it should be a
> brief refresher to set context
>
> ·         #4 – Councilor Questions:  moved up in sequence because it seems
> like next logical slide in the flow
>
> ·         #5 – Proposed Resolution:  new slide covering only the 4-part
> RESOLVED portion (edited and trimmed)
>
> ·         #6 – Timeline:  same content, but no longer hidden
>
> ·         #7 – Recommendations:  new title; 1st bullet new (to cover
> Chuck’s last comment); 2nd bullet retained to address managerial role
> issues which, I think, should be noted so that Council is clear that WP is
> only the FIRST part of a longer term process.
>
>
>
> Additional comments?
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> P.S.  The full Resolution is still in the deck, but it’s now Slide #9
> (after Questions) and hidden  -- just in case you need it.
>
>
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 3:10 PM
> *To:* Ken Bour; gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* Olga Cavalli
> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Slides for council meeting on Wednesday
>
>
>
> Thanks for the quick response Ken.  My personal opinion is that the slides
> should focus more directly on what we asking Council to approve in the
> motion rather than on the work of the DT.  The motion itself probably is not
> needed in the slides but a slide containing a brief listing of the four
> parts of the resolution would be very helpful.  After that the timeline
> slide would naturally follow.  And then the slide with the two questions.
>
>
>
> I am not sure that slide 2 is needed but if it remains I would suggest
> covering it very quickly.  Slide 3 is a good summary of the deliverable but
> I think it can be covered fairly quickly.
>
>
>
> I also think we need a slide toward the end that makes it very clear that
> approval of the motion only means approval of the first prioritization
> excercize and that, after that, we will review and improve the process and
> approve the additions to the GNSO Operating Procedures.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Ken Bour
> *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 2:45 PM
> *To:* gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* 'Olga Cavalli'
> *Subject:* [gnso-wpm-dt] Slides for council meeting on Wednesday
>
> Olga & WPM Team:
>
>
>
> Attached is a DRAFT set of slides proposed for the GNSO Council session on
> Wednesday.   I wasn’t sure how much information you might want to convey, so
> I based the content primarily on the key portions of the transmittal letter
> and resolution.   At present, there are 8 total slides two of which,
>  Resolution and Timeline, are marked “hidden” – available only if needed.
>  Slides 1 and 7 are bookends, which leaves 4 main content slides that should
> only take 5 minutes or so to present.   I did add a slide to address the two
> Councilor questions that occurred on the email list.
>
>
>
> I am happy to make any additional changes that you would like…
>
>
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> P.S.   I have been invited to attend the Council session and am planning to
> do so.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 11:19 AM
> *To:* gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* Ken Bour; Olga Cavalli
> *Subject:* Slides for council meeting on Wednesday
>
>
>
> Hi,
> during the preparation of the meeting on Wednesday, we decided to present
> the prioritization process with some slides.
> It should not be a long presentation, rather short (5 minutes...) and then
> have time for discussion and hopefully move forward with the motion after
> that.
> Ken, could you help me preparing the slides? I can present the during the
> call and you and others in the team can add comments if needed.
> We shoul addreess  the concerns that were rised in the GNSO email list.
> Any comments or suggestions are welcome.
> Regards
> Olga
>
>