Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] FW: Prioritization process

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
I think we had this discussion in the group once and we agreed and there
should be no problem in the GNSO.
Regards
Olga

2010/5/3 Jaime Plug In <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  I agree both with Chuck and Stéphane. Think the Council will agree too.
>
>
>
> *Jaime Wagner**
> *jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cel (51) 8126-0916
> Fax (51) 3123-1708
>
>
>
> *De:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *Em
> nome de *Stéphane Van Gelder
> *Enviada em:* segunda-feira, 3 de maio de 2010 07:58
> *Para:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Assunto:* Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] FW: Prioritization process
>
>
>
> Chuck,
>
>
>
> I think you should be putting the question to the Council as a whole, not
> restricting it to this WG.
>
>
>
> My own take: I agree that it would be great to have both Alan and Andrei
> participate in this.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Stéphane
>
> Le 3 mai 2010 à 06:26, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
>
>
>
>  Note the question asked by Alan regarding whether or not liaisons would
> participate in the prioritization exercise and note that I responded by
> saying that I assumed they would and added that I thought that our
> non-voting Councilor would participate as well, Andrei.  Olga confirmed the
> same view.  I thought it would be a good idea to make sure everyone on the
> WPM DT felt the same.  If anyone disagrees, please speak up.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:48 PM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: Prioritization process
>
> No question about Andrei (in my mind). He is a full Council member (but no
> vote). But I am a not-a-council-member-but-treated-like-one.  ;-)
>
> Alan
>
> At 29/04/2010 10:21 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
>  That would be my assumption Alan.
> I would also assume Andrei would participate.
>
> Chuck
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From*: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To*: Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent*: Thu Apr 29 15:45:52 2010
> *Subject*: Prioritization process
>
> Chuck (as Council Chair) and Olga (as WPM-DT chair),
>
> I have been asked to draft a comment on the prioritization effort on behalf
> of ALAC.
>
> In your minds, is it the intent that the ALAC Liaison to the GNSO Council
> participate in the prioritization process?  Based on the Bylaw definition of
> the Liaison as:
>
> "Liaisons shall not be members of or entitled to vote, to make or second
> motions, or to serve as an officer on the GNSO Council, but otherwise
> liaisons shall be entitled to participate on equal footing with members of
> the GNSO Council."
>
> I am assuming that I or my namesake will be a full-fledged participant.
>
> Alan
>
>
>