ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05: Follow-up to 23 June

  • To: <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05: Follow-up to 23 June
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:26:31 -0400

Robin's suggestion makes sense to me.


Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Robin Gross [mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Monday, June 25, 2007 04:09 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:     philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
Cc:     gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:        Re: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05:  Follow-up to 23 June

But there isn't consensus that strings should be rejected for non-legal 
and non-technical reasons.  

So perhaps we need to reach agreement on this point before we do the 
word smithing.


philip.sheppard@xxxxxx wrote:

>Lets not lose focus on the intent of recommendation 20 and our attempt to
>clarify the wording.
>It is NOT about:
>- local jurisdictions, national laws etc
>It is about:
>- sector or community based objection.
>Proposed edits which drive a coach and horses through the original intent
>are somewhat disapointing to see at this closing stage of our lengthy
>community based bottom-up dialogue.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy