Re: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05: Follow-up to 23 June
But there isn't consensus that strings should be rejected for non-legal and non-technical reasons. So perhaps we need to reach agreement on this point before we do the word smithing.
Thanks, Robin philip.sheppard@xxxxxx wrote:
Lets not lose focus on the intent of recommendation 20 and our attempt to clarify the wording. It is NOT about: - local jurisdictions, national laws etc It is about: - sector or community based objection. Proposed edits which drive a coach and horses through the original intent are somewhat disapointing to see at this closing stage of our lengthy community based bottom-up dialogue. Philip