Re: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05: Follow-up to 23 June

[Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

But there isn't consensus that strings should be rejected for non-legal 
and non-technical reasons.  

So perhaps we need to reach agreement on this point before we do the 
word smithing.
Thanks,
Robin


philip.sheppard@xxxxxx wrote:

> Lets not lose focus on the intent of recommendation 20 and our attempt to
> clarify the wording.
>
> It is NOT about:
> - local jurisdictions, national laws etc
>
> It is about:
> - sector or community based objection.
>
> Proposed edits which drive a coach and horses through the original intent
> are somewhat disapointing to see at this closing stage of our lengthy
> community based bottom-up dialogue.
>
> Philip
>