Re: [gtld-council] Updated tables and next meeting timing
- To: Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gtld-council] Updated tables and next meeting timing
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:07:50 -0400
Ok, I will add that back in. I though that had been replaced by the
On 12 jul 2007, at 21.15, Robin Gross wrote:
The NCUC proposal with respect to Rec. #20 is to narrow it to
technical or LEGAL objections. So valid legal claims opposing a
string may proceed without over-burdening the decision making
process and opening up subjective determinations or determinations
that are contrary to law. Objections based on laws (such as
trademark, unfair competition, misrepresentation, fraud, etc.)
would still be within the scope of reasons for objections, but ones
entirely unfounded on legal rights would not clog up the process
and inhibit innovation.
We are also concerned that established institutions are given
priority to own generic words over start-up innovators who do not
misrepresent themselves to the public.
Avri Doria wrote:
I have updated the tables based on my understand from the
meetings. Please send any comment, questions, corrections to the
I have added the Principles (including the new principle G) and
the Implementation Guidelines for ease of reference.
Pending Actions List:
Next Meeting of New gTLD Committee
Scheduled for Friday 13 July at 1200 UTC
(There had been some discussion of moving 1-2 hours later, but
this was never resolved. The timing needs to balance the
earliness for California and the lateness for Asia/Pacific.
Unless there is list agreement to move it, it will be at 1200 utc)
Small discussion groups for Rec 6 and Rec 20:
Liz will be coordinating these efforts. Please run any solutions
that are approaching a level of consensus in the discussion group
by the committee list, certainly no later then 12 July.