<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Objections to the comments filed by the Intellectual Property Constituency
- To: net-agreement-renewal@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Objections to the comments filed by the Intellectual Property Constituency
- From: "Richard Hoopes" <rhoopes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:08:50 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div><span><div><span>To whom it may
concern:</span></div><div><span><br></span></div> <div><span>I am the owner of
<a href="http://orsomething.net">orsomething.net</a> a .net registrant if you
will. I am writing to express my objections to the comments filed by the
Intellectual Property Constituency, available here:</span></div> <div
style="clear: both;"><span><a
href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/net-agreement-renewal/pdfTeYfTqqAOg.pdf"
mce_href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/net-agreement-renewal/pdfTeYfTqqAOg.pdf"
rel="nofollow">http://forum.icann.org/lists/net-agreement-renewal/pdfTeYfTqqAOg.pdf</a></span></div></span></p><div><br></div><div><span><p><span>I
am a domain registrant without an official office, just a private individual
what a .net domain. I vehemently object to the idea that I should be
forced to publicly publish my home address to the internet. When one
thinks this process through, it will obviously be clear that this is a bad
idea. So bad, that I see the IPC has already taken steps to protect their
information by making their domain registration "Discreet". A bit of
amusing hypocrisy isn't it!</span></div><div><span><br></span></div>
<div><span>For these reasons, I ask that you disregard the comments of the IPC
entirely.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div> <div style="clear:
both;"><span>Thank you,</span></div></span></div><div><br></div><div>Richard
Hoopes</div><div><a
href="mailto:rhoopes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx">rhoopes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a><br></div></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|