| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 Objections to the comments filed by the Intellectual Property Constituency
To: net-agreement-renewal@xxxxxxxxxSubject: Objections to the comments filed by the Intellectual Property ConstituencyFrom: "Richard Hoopes" <rhoopes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:08:50 -0700 
 <html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000; 
font-size:10pt;"><div><span><div><span>To whom it may 
concern:</span></div><div><span><br></span></div> <div><span>I am the owner of 
<a href="http://orsomething.net">orsomething.net</a> a .net registrant if you 
will.  I am writing to express my objections to the comments filed by the 
Intellectual  Property Constituency, available here:</span></div> <div 
style="clear: both;"><span><a 
href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/net-agreement-renewal/pdfTeYfTqqAOg.pdf" 
mce_href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/net-agreement-renewal/pdfTeYfTqqAOg.pdf" 
rel="nofollow">http://forum.icann.org/lists/net-agreement-renewal/pdfTeYfTqqAOg.pdf</a></span></div></span></p><div><br></div><div><span><p><span>I
 am a domain registrant without an official office, just a private individual 
what a .net domain.  I vehemently object to the idea that I should be 
forced to publicly publish my home address to the internet.  When one 
thinks this process through, it will obviously be clear that this is a bad 
idea.  So bad, that I see the IPC has already taken steps to protect their 
information by making their domain registration "Discreet".  A bit of 
amusing hypocrisy isn't it!</span></div><div><span><br></span></div> 
<div><span>For these reasons, I ask that you disregard the comments of the IPC 
entirely.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div> <div style="clear: 
both;"><span>Thank you,</span></div></span></div><div><br></div><div>Richard 
Hoopes</div><div><a 
href="mailto:rhoopes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx">rhoopes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a><br></div></span></body></html>
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |