Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] GNSO PDP Feb 06: Proposed Work Plan

["Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am drafting edits to the report to reflect the BC request /recommendation for 
ind. Experts. I believe we have seen some suggested questions already. As I 
review my notes, there seemed to be support from others for ind experts- timing 
and questions to be elaborated. The draft omits all that, unfortunately. My 
edits suggest its inclusion. 

Given bs demands of my day job-- I know, most of you thought I didn't HAVE a 
day job :-) -- I will prob. Not submit until my COB. 
Regards,
Marilyn Cade


-----Original Message-----
From: Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:52:49 
To:"Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:<pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] GNSO PDP Feb 06:  Proposed Work Plan

Jon


Sorry -- I wasn't clear enough.  If you look at the 20 October date -- there's 
information there about whether the Council may choose to hear from independent 
experts (that part is specifically taken from the PDP guidelines).


On the call I thought it was clear that we would do the work with the expert 
materials first and then consider the necessity (from the whole TF perspective) 
of hearing from live experts.


The much more detailed expert materials are in preparation -- today is the 
deadline for anyone who wants to submit any further suggestions to me about 
materials.  I haven't received anything further since the teleconference.


I hope that helps -- of course, let me know if you need anything further.


Kind regards.


Liz

 
.....................................................


Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob




 


On 15 Aug 2006, at 22:29, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:


Liz:  Where does advice from independent experts fit into the work plan?  It is 
important that we hear from experts who are looking at these specific factual 
and legal questions.  I haven’t seen anything very helpful in existing expert 
materials.  Thanks.  Jon

 



----------------

From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx: 
<mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx> ] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 6:38 AM
To: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: <mailto:pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] GNSO PDP Feb 06: Proposed Work Plan

 

Colleagues


 


I have set out below my understanding of where the group had agreement from 
yesterday's call.  During the call, no motions were agreed and the minutes will 
only reflect tentative discussions.


 


Work plan


 


16 August 2006:  Final edits to be sent on Preliminary Taskforce Report.  
Please include "impact on constituency analysis" and please provide specific 
text change suggestions.


 


16 August 2006:  Final deadline for submission of suggestions for expert 
materials


 


23 August 2006:  Distribution of expert materials for consideration by the TF


 


21 September 2006:  Proposed date for next teleconference - agenda will be sent 
7 days prior to the call.  Call designed to discuss expert materials and impact 
on drafting of Preliminary Taskforce Report.  Note that this is after the 
already scheduled Amsterdam meetings and after the regular GNSO Council call on 
14 September.


 


28 September 2006:  Release completed  Preliminary Taskforce Report and begin 
20 day public comment period


 


10 October 2006:  Public comment period closes


 


20 October 2006:  Release of Final Report to GNSO Council -- please note 
section 10 of PDP guidelines which refers to Council deliberation and, if the 
Council chooses, hearing of expert advisors


 


30 October 2006:  GNSO Council meets to discuss Final Report.  Incorporation of 
any final commentary. 


 


3 November 2006:  Release of Board Report.


 


Note that these dates reflect the PDP guidelines as they stand. 


 


I would appreciate a formal motion being passed to agree this schedule.  This 
can be done by email.  Note section 11 of the current PDP guidelines that 
require minuting of all decisions for incorporation into the Board Report.


 


In addition, I would also appreciate a motion that would approve the minutes of 
the previous call -- please consult those minutes if you were present at the 
meeting so that you can vote to accept those minutes before our next 
teleconference.


 


Of course, any questions or comments, let me know.


 


Liz


 




.....................................................


 


Liz Williams


Senior Policy Counselor


ICANN - Brussels


+32 2 234 7874 tel


+32 2 234 7848 fax


+32 497 07 4243 mob