Did I miss the previous announcement on a January 16th meeting? If it
was previously announced, I apologize for this note. If, however, it
was not, when was this decided?
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services & Business Development
[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb06 task force call 16 January 2007 -
Apologies for not sending out an agenda sooner, though the agenda is
probably pretty obvious.
We have a meeting scheduled for 16 Jan - Tuesday next.
I suggest the following agenda. I also suggest we plan on a 2 hour
call if at all possible.
0 - Roll call
- Changes in Statements
- Changes to agenda
1 - Review of status and ongoing schedule.
- Meeting schedule for next month
- Document readiness
Current Schedule does not include the interim meeting which is
planned. The original schedule include the possibility of meeting
face to face
on 15 Feb to finalize the report instead of doing a conference
call. Now that the
face to face has been moved to the week after we need to decide
whether we need
the face to face, and if we do, we have to figure out how to deal
with the week's
slip in the existing schedule:
20 December 2006 Submission of pending constituency
draft policy recommendations
20 December 2006 - 1 February 2007 Completion of outstanding
TOR5 Uses of registry data
16 January 07 - TF working call on TOR 5
23 January 07 - TF working call on any outstanding work
8 February 2007 Release draft Task Force Report to Task
15 February 2007 TF conference call to confirm TF report for
distribution to Council
22 Feb 2007 GNSO Council meeting to consider draft Task
-- note that this topic will need to be added to the
25 Feb 2007 Post draft Task Force Report for public comment
18 March 2007 Public comment period closes and
public comments and constituency impact statements into
27 March 2007 GNSO Council Lisbon meeting to
sign off final Task Force Report
2 - Work on open item - ToR 5
Based on earlier polling the TF decided that further TF work was
5a Examine whether or not there should be a policy regarding the
registry data for purposes other than for which it was collected,
so, what the elements of that policy should be.
5b. Determine whether any policy is necessary to ensure non-
discriminatory access to registry data that is made available to
- brief discussion on path to completion
- substantive discussions on ToR 5
In preparation for the meeting TF members should review: