Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb06 task force call 16 January 2007 - 1900 UTC

[Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jeff

The dates were set at the Sao Paulo meeting and have been loaded on  
the GNSO calendar since then.  I set out a proposed work plan which  
included these two calls (and another if necessary) to get the  
remaining work completed.

Kind regards.

Liz
.....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob




On 12 Jan 2007, at 16:53, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Did I miss the previous announcement on a January 16th meeting?  If it
> was previously announced, I apologize for this note.  If, however, it
> was not, when was this decided?
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services  & Business Development
>
> NeuStar, Inc.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 7:16 AM
> To: PDPfeb06
> Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb06 task force call 16 January 2007 -
> 1900 UTC
>
> Hi,
>
> Apologies for not sending out an agenda sooner, though the agenda is
> probably pretty obvious.
> We have a meeting scheduled for 16 Jan - Tuesday next.
>
> I suggest the following agenda.  I also suggest we plan on a 2 hour
> call if at all possible.
>
> 0 - Roll call
>    - Changes in Statements
>    - Changes to agenda
>
> 1 - Review of status and ongoing schedule.
>      - Meeting schedule for next month
>      - Document readiness
>
>    Current Schedule does not include the interim meeting which is
> currently being
>    planned.  The original schedule include the possibility of meeting
> face to face
>    on 15 Feb to finalize the report instead of doing a conference
> call.  Now that the
>    face to face has been moved to the week after we need to decide
> whether we need
>    the face to face, and if we do, we have to figure out how to deal
> with the week's
>    slip in the existing schedule:
>
>          20 December 2006 Submission of pending constituency
> statements on
>              draft policy recommendations
>
>          20 December 2006 - 1 February 2007 Completion of outstanding
> work on
>              TOR5  Uses of registry data
>
>              16 January 07 - TF working call on TOR 5
>              23 January 07 - TF working call on any outstanding work
> from TORs
>
>            8 February 2007 Release draft Task Force Report to Task  
> Force
>
>           15 February 2007 TF conference call to confirm TF report for
>              distribution to Council
>
>           22 Feb 2007 GNSO Council meeting to consider draft Task
> Force Report
>                  -- note that this topic will need to be added to the
> Council's
>                     formal agenda
>
>           25 Feb 2007 Post draft Task Force Report for public comment
> period
>
>           18 March 2007 Public comment period closes and
> incorporation of
>              public comments and constituency impact statements into
> report
>
>           27 March 2007 GNSO Council Lisbon meeting to
>                         sign off final Task Force Report
>
>
> 2 - Work on open item - ToR 5
>    Based on earlier polling the TF decided that further TF work was
> required on:
>
>    5a Examine whether or not there should be a policy regarding the
> use of
>    registry data for purposes other than for which it was collected,
> and if
>    so, what the elements of that policy should be.
>
>    5b. Determine whether any policy is necessary to ensure non-
>    discriminatory access to registry data that is made available to
> third
>    parties.
>
>
>    - brief discussion on path to completion
>    - substantive discussions on ToR 5
>
>    In preparation for the meeting TF members should review:
>    http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/PDPFeb06ExpertMaterials_draft2.pdf
> pg.15-20
>
>
> thanks
> a.