ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for your review

  • To: soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for your review
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:22:02 -0400

Hi,

It wasn't obvious to me.  With your change, to me, it read like that was the 
end of it: the group produces a report by September 13 and then was done.

Despite seeming redundant to you, does this sentence add some content to the 
ToR that you find objectionable?

a.

On 25 Aug 2010, at 05:13, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:

> To be honest, I don't see the point of this addition.
> 
> It seems to me to be obvious that if anything else needs to be done, then the 
> WG would communicate that to the various SOs and ACs that comprise it.
> 
> We are not saying anything specifically useful by adding this sentence in my 
> opinion.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 24 août 2010 à 19:10, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> 
>> 
>> Any opposition to Avri's addition?
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
>>> Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:12 AM
>>> To: soac-mapo
>>> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for
>>> your review
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 23 Aug 2010, at 18:31, Liz Gasster wrote:
>>> 
>>>> <Rec6 TOR updated as of 23 Aug 2300 UTC.doc>
>>> 
>>> I am personally mostly fine with tis version of the ToR.
>>> 
>>> While I understand and accept the idea of removing the word
>>> preliminary, it does leave the ToR sort of dangling as to what happens
>>> after this report.  but not stating what happens after this report, it
>>> makes it seem as if that is the end of the story.
>>> 
>>> And it may be.
>>> 
>>> Perhaps adding something like the following, in addition to removing
>>> preliminary, would help:
>>> 
>>> After submission of the report, the CWG will review what, if anything,
>>> remains to be done on the defined tasks and will communicate that to
>>> the ALAC, GAC and GNSO council.
>>> 
>>> (note i put the 3 in alphabetical order which is something i recommend
>>> for elsewhere in the report)
>>> 
>>> a.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy