ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for your review

  • To: "soac-mapo" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for your review
  • From: "Frank March" <Frank.March@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:02:32 +1200

I am happy to agree to this suggestion that we finalise the TOR as they stand

----
Frank March
Senior Specialist Advisor
Digital Development
Energy and Communications Branch, Ministry of Economic Development
33 Bowen Street, PO Box 1473, WELLINGTON
Mobile: (+64) 021 494165
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Friday, 27 August 2010 2:00 a.m.
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of 
> Reference for your review
> 
> 
> May I suggest that, considering the overall support we have 
> for the current version of the ToR with Avri's and my edits, 
> the co-chairs call time on this and declare the ToR final so 
> that we move on?
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 26 août 2010 à 14:48, Alan Greenberg a écrit :
> 
> > 
> > I agree. I actually think that the word "preliminary" was 
> the right word. This is a tough problem that has been 
> discussed for several years. Perhaps we will come up with an 
> inspired solution to it in next three weeks (which is when 
> September 13th is). Or not. If we have some indication of a 
> direction that will work, we will need to tell the Board. 
> Setting tight constraints is an effective mechanism to get 
> people to produce, but it is not magic and cannot be 
> guaranteed to work - VI is the proof if we needed one. So we 
> need to keep our options flexible.
> > 
> > Based on experiences in other groups, if we wanted a final 
> report for the 13th, we should really have a draft already to 
> allow for the inevitable discussions over both major and 
> detailed wording. But we have not yet even started the 
> substantive discussion.
> > 
> > So let's agree to this middle ground and get to the real work.
> > 
> > Alan
> > 
> > 
> > At 26/08/2010 07:31 AM, Jon Nevett wrote:
> > 
> >> Let's go with the current draft that includes Stephane's 
> deletion and 
> >> Avri's addition and move on to the substance.  Thanks.  Jon
> > 
> 
> 
> 
newzealand.govt.nz - connecting you to New Zealand central & local government 
services

Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the 
Ministry of Economic Development. This message and any files transmitted with 
it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you 
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivery to the 
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and 
that any use is strictly prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the 
message and any attachment from your computer.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy