<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] Redefiningthe 4th criteria
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "soac-mapo" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Redefiningthe 4th criteria
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:37:16 -0400
That makes sense to me Avri. Now who is going to propose a solution?
Hopefully, by putting all our heads together, we can develop one. It
may take a few iterations, but I am impressed with the thought processes
going on.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:47 PM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Redefiningthe 4th criteria
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I think the best way to avoid yet another delay is to look for the
> smallest possible change that can be made to the DAGv4 implementation
> that yields a solution to the GAC-ALAC/NCUC conundrum.
>
>
> a.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|