<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] Redefiningthe 4th criteria
- To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'soac-mapo'" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Redefiningthe 4th criteria
- From: "Terry L Davis, P.E." <tdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:33:09 -0700
+1
Also it is interesting to watch how the responses to this challenging topic
vary somewhat between our different backgrounds (technical, legal, business,
ops, political, etc) and actually is sort of neat.
Take care
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:47 PM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Redefiningthe 4th criteria
Hi,
I think the best way to avoid yet another delay is to look for the smallest
possible change that can be made to the DAGv4 implementation that yields a
solution to the GAC-ALAC/NCUC conundrum.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|