RE: [soac-mapo] Terminology DRSP

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

Philip
I think your logic falls apart on the simple observation that it is the Board 
that resolves the dispute, not the so-called DRSP. Evan's comments were exactly 
right. The label should follow the function, and it's an advisory panel not a 
"resolution" service.

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Philip Sheppard
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 9:56 AM
To: 'soac-mapo'
Subject: [soac-mapo] Terminology DRSP

Evan wrote:
"re DRSP - "Chuck, I really would suggest changing the name"
----------------------
I disagree for the reasons stated in an earlier post

- the intention is indeed to outsource this advice, and that constitutes a 
service being provided hence SP
- there is a dispute between the applicant and the objector that this service 
is helping to resolve hence DR
- it is consistent with other objection terminology in the DAG.

Lets not try to redefine useful common terminology based on linguistic 
subtleties that (in English only) may advocate one position or another.

----------------------------
Why is this so different from other objections?
An objection (disputing the applicant's ability to get the name) is evaluated 
and a determination made by the service provider.
The Board accepts or rejects that determination.

Philip