RE: [soac-mapo] Terminology DRSP

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Milton,

 

Are you suggesting that the Board should be involved at a micro level in
evaluation of Rec6 string objections? 

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 4:07 PM
To: Philip Sheppard; 'soac-mapo'
Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Terminology DRSP

 

Philip

I think your logic falls apart on the simple observation that it is the
Board that resolves the dispute, not the so-called DRSP. Evan's comments
were exactly right. The label should follow the function, and it's an
advisory panel not a "resolution" service. 

 

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 9:56 AM
To: 'soac-mapo'
Subject: [soac-mapo] Terminology DRSP

 

Evan wrote:

"re DRSP - "Chuck, I really would suggest changing the name"

----------------------

I disagree for the reasons stated in an earlier post

 

- the intention is indeed to outsource this advice, and that constitutes
a service being provided hence SP

- there is a dispute between the applicant and the objector that this
service is helping to resolve hence DR

- it is consistent with other objection terminology in the DAG.

 

Lets not try to redefine useful common terminology based on linguistic
subtleties that (in English only) may advocate one position or another.

 

----------------------------

Why is this so different from other objections?

An objection (disputing the applicant's ability to get the name) is
evaluated and a determination made by the service provider.

The Board accepts or rejects that determination.

 

Philip