RE: [soac-mapo] Terminology DRSP (and more on Rec 2.1)

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> with the assumption that if the appellant is either the GAC or ALAC, the
> board would then discuss their decision with them as required in the
> bylaw currently for GAC should they be requested to do so by the AC.
> 

I do not agree with that. The GAC has input rights and a "right to get an 
explanation of why the Board diverged from its advice" with respect to POLICY 
MAKING, not implementations. Individual TLD decisions are implementations of a 
policy, not a policy.
So I neither GAC nor ALAC is entitled to some kind of an explanation if they 
forward an objection and it is not upheld. Moreover, please note the capacity 
burden this would place on the Board and staff if there are a lot of 
objections.