<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [GAC] [soac-mapo] Terminology DRSP (and more on Rec 2.1)
- To: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [GAC] [soac-mapo] Terminology DRSP (and more on Rec 2.1)
- From: Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:06:07 +0200
I think Mary and Milton are pointing the way to an understanding that
could get consensus. The distinction is important and I feel quite
comfortable with it.
Bertrand
On Tuesday, September 14, 2010, Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On the “advice” vs. “recommendation” issue, I think Mary got it
> exactly right here:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For
> example, there's a difference (to my mind) between an expert opnion that
> "this series of words (i.e. the string) is contrary to a well-known
> principle of international law" and one that says "this string should
> not be approved because it is contrary to a well-known principle of
> international law". Wouldn't it be more appropriate for the expert opnion
> to be along the lines of the former, such that the Board then has to decide
> whether, in light of that finding, it will or won't approve the application?
>
>
>
> In other words, the experts can tell the Board that in their opinion
> a string is clearly contrary to principles of int. law, possibly contrary, or
> clearly not contrary. But it cannot and should not say, “do not approve this
> string” or “do approve this string”
>
>
>
> That distinction may seem nuanced, but it really matters. It is
> the board making the decision, not the experts. This distinction is not quite
> captured, however, by the current proposal for 4.1, which says that the
> experts
> cannot provide advice or recommendations, which is why I voted against it.
>
>
>
> As I have said before, whether you call the experts’ report “advice”
> or “recommendation” or something does not matter much if the Board must have a
> supermajority to kill an application based on an objection, and it must have
> that supermajority regardless of what the experts said.
>
>
>
> So in my opinion, the board should NOT vote to approve or
> discard the decision handed to it by the experts. It should use the experts’
> report as an input to its decision. The decision is its own.
>
>
>
> --MM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for
the Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of
Foreign and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32
"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de
Saint Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|