RE: [soac-mapo] Terminology DRSP (and more on Rec 2.1)

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

I think you got this one incorrectly. 

> -----Original Message-----
> 3. A 2/3 majority would be required for a Board decision (pro or con).

What I proposed was 2/3 supermajority vote to uphold an objection.

What you've proposed above doesn't seem to work: a TLD that doesn't get 2/3 pro 
or con would be in a no-man's land. 
It's either 2/3 to veto or 2/3 to approve.

I believe that if a TLD application meets all of the criteria required by the 
new gTLD policy (technical, business, etc.) then for a Rec 6 objection to veto 
it the veto must get a 2/3 vote. Approval of the TLD should just require a 
majority.