<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Comments on 4.2 and 5.4
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Comments on 4.2 and 5.4
- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:56:24 +0200
+1 on all congratulations to Chuck for running such a tight schedule.
On 22/09/2010 23:36, Gomes, Chuck wrote :
> [Gomes, Chuck] I thought that there would be a pool of experts from whom
> a subset would be chosen for a given objection and that the Board would
> be involved in approving the provider of experts but not that they would
> be involved in selecting experts on a case by case basis. In my
> opinion, to do that would involve the Board in micro management, which I
> think is not the appropriate for a Board of Directors.
>
Indeed, that was my assumption as well. The Board's workload in
micro-management *has* to be lightened.
I gather that this will be one of the details to work out in the
implementation plan, should the CIST that's proposed, be voted.
Kind regards,
Olivier
--
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|