Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Action points - JAS WG call 8 June

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

Thanks Elaine.

I think it's a very good document.   Look forward to feedback from the Group.

Some comments from me:

Proposal 2.   Seems very reasonable to me that this should be adopted for the 
relatively small subset of applicants who will meet our criteria

Proposal 3.  The explanatory memoranda to the DAG already indicate that Auction 
Proceeds are a potential source of funding for our applicants -- so I expect a 
positive response on this proposal.

Proposal 4.  The $25K per year (more if the registry has >50K names) is to 
cover the cost of ICANN operationally managing the TLD,  as well as 
administratively managing the relationship with the registry operator.   The 
fee was $75K per year (minimum) in earlier versions of the DAG - but was 
subsequently reduced to $25K minimum.


Proposals 5 & 6.    I expect a response here that any surplus funds might be 
refundable  - but only after the TLD process is complete and all costs have 
been tallied.  That said,  I have no problem with us making this recommendation.



On Jun 11, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Elaine Pruis wrote:

> <WT1 Snapshot v1.docx>