<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] continuity of operations funding requirement
- To: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] continuity of operations funding requirement
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:49:59 -0400
Hi Richard,
On 8/12/10 11:10 AM, Richard Tindal wrote:
My understanding of the Financial Continuity Instrument is an amount
of cash, or an irrevocable cash instrument, which the registry places
under the control of ICANN.
The term is defined in the evaluation criteria, p94 of 312 in the
draft-rfp-clean-28may10-en.pdf, para 2, which reads:
"In the Continuity question in the financial section (see Question
#50), up to 3 points are awarded if an applicant provides, at the
application stage, a financial instrument that will guarantee ongoing
registry operations in the event of a business failure. This extra
point can serve to guarantee passing the financial criteria for
applicants who score the minimum passing score for each of the
individual criteria. The purpose of this weighting is to reward
applicants who make early arrangements for the protection of
registrants and to accept relatively riskier business plans where
registrants are protected."
What is being provided, and where, is not defined.
Assume an application by a cooperative located in Korea for an IDN
string related to agriculture and rural food marketing which creates
a financial instrument denominated in KRW at the (Korean) National
Agricultural Cooperative Federation, NH Bank [1].
The proposed facilities-based registry operation is in Korea, and the
proposed operating costs, the costs that are the actual expense to be
continued by some instrument, are proposed to all be paid in KRW to
Korean accounts, individual (staff) and corporate (vendor).
I think it is difficult to conclude that the financial instrument only
meets the continuity purpose if it is in dollars in a bank in Los Angeles.
At p186 of 312 there is a prior to or concurrent with the execution of
the registry agreement reference, and the definition refers back to
the quoted text above, from p94.
At p200 there is "... Registry Operator ... has duly executed and
delivered to ICANN an instrument that secures the funds required to
perform registry functions for the TLD in the event of the termination
or expiration ..." Here the language addresses the instrument, what
the currency instrumentalized is, and what institution the instrument
is drawn upon, is undefined.
That's all we know from draft-rfp-clean-28may10-en.pdf.
Eric
[1] http://www.nonghyup.com/Main/main.aspx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|