ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] continuity of operations funding requirement

  • To: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] continuity of operations funding requirement
  • From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:49:59 -0400


Hi Richard,
On 8/12/10 11:10 AM, Richard Tindal wrote:

My understanding of the Financial Continuity Instrument is an amount
of cash, or an irrevocable cash instrument, which the registry places
under the control of ICANN.

The term is defined in the evaluation criteria, p94 of 312 in the draft-rfp-clean-28may10-en.pdf, para 2, which reads:

"In the Continuity question in the financial section (see Question #50), up to 3 points are awarded if an applicant provides, at the application stage, a financial instrument that will guarantee ongoing registry operations in the event of a business failure. This extra point can serve to guarantee passing the financial criteria for applicants who score the minimum passing score for each of the individual criteria. The purpose of this weighting is to reward applicants who make early arrangements for the protection of registrants and to accept relatively riskier business plans where registrants are protected."

What is being provided, and where, is not defined.

Assume an application by a cooperative located in Korea for an IDN string related to agriculture and rural food marketing which creates a financial instrument denominated in KRW at the (Korean) National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, NH Bank [1].

The proposed facilities-based registry operation is in Korea, and the proposed operating costs, the costs that are the actual expense to be continued by some instrument, are proposed to all be paid in KRW to Korean accounts, individual (staff) and corporate (vendor).

I think it is difficult to conclude that the financial instrument only meets the continuity purpose if it is in dollars in a bank in Los Angeles.

At p186 of 312 there is a prior to or concurrent with the execution of the registry agreement reference, and the definition refers back to the quoted text above, from p94.

At p200 there is "... Registry Operator ... has duly executed and delivered to ICANN an instrument that secures the funds required to perform registry functions for the TLD in the event of the termination or expiration ..." Here the language addresses the instrument, what the currency instrumentalized is, and what institution the instrument is drawn upon, is undefined.

That's all we know from draft-rfp-clean-28may10-en.pdf.

Eric

[1] http://www.nonghyup.com/Main/main.aspx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy