<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Draft replacement proposal for bundling
- To: Andrew Mack <amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Draft replacement proposal for bundling
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 15:06:13 -0400
Andrew,
You wrote "... this discount open to anyone, as our goal is to get the
scripts out there -- a potential benefit to all script users ..."
This would then allow Versign access to discounts for the scripts of
its strategic choices, advancing its particular interest.
Just to take as an example, the Hebrew Script ".com equivalent" that
some ISPs provide in Israel, and assume that the Hebrew Script market
is sufficiently small that a second registry offering Hebrew Script
would be problematic,
1. Are the interests of the Hebrew Script users best advanced by
Verisign's successful execution of its goal of getting ".com" in the
Hebrew Script?
2. Are the interests of the Hebrew Script users best advanced by the
current ".com in Hebrew" operator's successful execution of its goal
of getting ".com" in the Hebrew Script?
3. Do the interests of the Hebrew Script users lie elsewhere than in
the choice of Verisign or someone else operating a ".com" in the
Hebrew Script?
Obviously, Verisign can "find the money" at any discount faster than a
Community that meets our test for need. Similarly, Verisign's
competitor, someone I, and I suspect others know, in the Hebrew Script
market, can "find the money" at any discount faster than a Community
that meets our test for need.
If the cost is the same for Verisign, and for a
investor-or-speculator, as it is for a Community, then it seems likely
that where the Community meets a needs criteria, its ability to
support two or more registries is problematic, and therefore granting
any applicant a lowered cost barrier to entry in that script market is
really the granting of a script monopoly to some entity external to
the Community.
Really, if our only goal was to "get the scripts out there", the best
course of action would be to offer terms to Verisign. I think our
goals are more complicated than just "get the scripts out there", as
it makes a difference who is offering a script, to whom, and under
what policies.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|