<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consensus survey
- To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Consensus survey
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:37:16 -0400
Hi,
Just want to note to say that we have 22 people on the groups list. This is
an opportunity for those who have not been able to participate a lot lately,
but who have been following the list and the drafts, to add their voice to the
call.
a.
On 15 Oct 2010, at 00:18, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> As of now (about midnight Eastern US/Canada time) we have 12 participants in
> the survey. Some of you may have seen 13 participants, but one of them was a
> duplicate from someone accidentally voting twice, and that duplicate has been
> removed.
>
> Thanks to everyone for participating so quickly on such short notice.
>
> We're still missing a few regulars, including Elaine, Cheryl and Richard (who
> used to be heavily involved but seems to have dropped off of late). Please
> provide your opinions to the survey if you haven't yet.
>
> The results are certainly interesting and, at least in one or two cases,
> surprising. I hope we will have found this poll to be of use as a mid-process
> snapshot that will allow us to achieve better consensus. It is *not* (andf
> never was) intended as a final tally or anything formal, and I do not intend
> to run another survey.
>
> - Evan
>
> PS: I will be probably unable to attend today's meeting because of a
> last-minute day-job issue. I will try to attend and may be available by Adobe
> but will probably not be on much (if any) of the call.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|