ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Revison 2.17-2 - updated

  • To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Revison 2.17-2 - updated
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:37:06 +0200

hi,

While he asked in a particularly humous way, others have asked.  that is why i 
thought i should try to craft answer.

a.

On 18 Oct 2010, at 17:11, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:

> On 10/17/10 1:04 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Added another FAQ item, 4.6, to respond the blog accusing the group of 
>> having pulled the figure of $10M out of a hat 
>> (http://icannology.blogspot.com/2010/10/pulling-numbers-out-of-hat.html).
> 
> His point being that 10 is arbitrary. It would be useful if he made a case 
> for 9 or 11, or 0 or 100. Absent that, his critique amounts to a critique of 
> anyone's ability to articulate an amount more useful that the absence of an 
> amount.
> 
> I suggest ignoring the "comment".
> 
> Eric





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy