<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Revison 2.17-2 - updated
- To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Revison 2.17-2 - updated
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:37:06 +0200
hi,
While he asked in a particularly humous way, others have asked. that is why i
thought i should try to craft answer.
a.
On 18 Oct 2010, at 17:11, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> On 10/17/10 1:04 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Added another FAQ item, 4.6, to respond the blog accusing the group of
>> having pulled the figure of $10M out of a hat
>> (http://icannology.blogspot.com/2010/10/pulling-numbers-out-of-hat.html).
>
> His point being that 10 is arbitrary. It would be useful if he made a case
> for 9 or 11, or 0 or 100. Absent that, his critique amounts to a critique of
> anyone's ability to articulate an amount more useful that the absence of an
> amount.
>
> I suggest ignoring the "comment".
>
> Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|