<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG - Next steps and few clarifications - PLEASE REVIEW AND CONFIRM
- To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG - Next steps and few clarifications - PLEASE REVIEW AND CONFIRM
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:50:39 -0400
Hi,
Karla, I think this is a good write up. Thanks.
I think one other thing we need to do is to write up the suggested charter
amendments we wish to make so that our liaisons can take them to the ALAC and
Council in time for their next voting.
These should probably be inline with:
a. the suggestions we make in the milestone report
b. the board's recommendations.
Perhaps this is a task for Thursday in addition to talking about what we want
to do with the session in Cartagena.
thanks
a.
On 1 Nov 2010, at 13:14, Karla Valente wrote:
> Dear Evan, Avri,
>
> Here is my understanding about the next steps regarding our JAS WG work.
> Please let me know if I have missed anything.
>
> Overall publication plan:
>
> 1. Tuesday – we will finalize the report and have it ready for
> publication. This report will be posted for public comments following an
> announcement.
> a. I am finalizing the glossary today
> b. I have made changes to version 2.20 based on our discussion on Friday
> c. I am also drafting an announcement – plain English, Q&A style to
> make it easy for the press to understand
> d. Once approved by all of you, I will submit the final milestone
> report and announcement to translations (French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic and
> Chinese).
>
> 2. We need to keep in mind that we will publish all in English and it
> will take few weeks for the translations to be ready. As this is for public
> comment, it would be unfair to have a short period for the additional
> languages. Here is the public comment period I recommend:
> a. Starting date English version – November 5
> b. Starting date additional languages – November 19? (I am making a
> guess here and cannot garantee, there is a high number of docs being
> translated at this time….)
> c. Closing date for both fora – January 4?
>
> I WILL SEND YOU THE MILESTONE REPORT BY THE END OF THE DAY.
>
> Clarifications
>
> · Regarding policy staff – The policy staff have been getting an
> update on where we are with the work. They are aware we have a publication
> for public comment coming up soon. I will be happy to pass on the report and
> any other message to them.
>
> · Regarding Applicant Guidebook – as I mentioned on Friday, we need
> to publish the AGB by the end of this week. I am not clear what additional
> information from this initiative is suppose to be there. Is the intent of the
> WG to have a note saying there is an initiative to address needy applicants
> and maybe point to the Wiki?
>
> · Some of you asked me about the new budget - US$200K for this
> initiative. The detailed allocation of this $$ has not been discussed yet.
>
> What we still need to do:
>
> · Final review of the Milestone Report
> · Agree on the glossary definitions – most are standard ICANN term,
> but some we should agree upon. I will highlight the latter.
> · Finalize the Summary and Analysis of the Public Comments received
> on the snap shot – this is to be published as part of the Addenda and
> separately.
> · I have reserved one hour for a session in Cartagena. We need to
> agree on the structure and details. I have few ideas I would like to share.
> We need to ensure we advertise this session and make it accessible.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Karla Valente
> Product/Services Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
> Direct: + 1 310 301 3878
> Mobile: +1 310 936 4639
> Skype: kdlvalente
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|