Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] On the v6 requirement

["Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Avri

If someone wants to run a registry properly they are going to have to provide a 
redundant system for dns and a lot more besides. If they can't do this 100% in 
their own country they will have to use services overseas (which is quite 
normal anyway - most cctld registries use 3rd parties overseas to handle dns at 
some level).
I don't see why this is being made into an "issue"
IPv4 is going to be exhausted very very soon. IPv6 unfortunately isn't 
available to everyone everywhere regardless of region. (I can only think of a 
handful of ISPs offering it to their users in Europe)

So I don't see the ipv6 "issue" as really being of special significance for 
this group

Regards

Michele

Mr. Michele Neylon
Blacknight
http://Blacknight.tel

Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity

On 23 Dec 2010, at 18:20, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 23 Dec 2010, at 12:56, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
> 
>> All LIRs that have v6 assignments have absolutely huge ones. I don't see why 
>> having ipv6 is a problem for anyone. If it is then they've got other more 
>> serious issues to deal with
> 
> 
> Are you making a claim that in all development areas, IPv6 is available and 
> running and no one should have any trouble establishing full IPv6 
> connectivity from anywhere in the world that someone wants to start a full 
> service registry?
> 
> Or are you arguing that because there are enough IPv6 addresses whether their 
> ISP support V6 or not, that is good enough.
> 
> Or is this an argument that they just use RSPs in developed areas and quit 
> messing about trying to enter the game themselves.
> 
> a.
> 
>