ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter

  • To: Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
  • From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:02:47 +0000

All this discussion of charters has me completely confused

Could someone please explain in very clear and simple terms what this actually 
means?


On 18 Jan 2011, at 12:55, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:

> I agree with Alan.
> ALAC shouldn’t change the Charter adopted, and at the end, we should clearly 
> say under which charter each recommendation falls.
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tijani BEN JEMAA
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
> Phone : + 216 70 825 231
> Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
> Fax     : + 216 70 825 231
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Alan Greenberg
> Envoyé : mardi 18 janvier 2011 04:28
> À : Andrew Mack; Eric Brunner-Williams
> Cc : JAS
> Objet : Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
>  
> Given the amount of time that the GNSO has taken (discussion time, not 
> elapsed), I do not see much interest in re-opening this discussion in the 
> near future. If the ALAC decides to (basically) stay where it is with its 
> charter (perhaps adding the IDN issue), then there can be some discussion 
> between the ALAC and GNSO, although I do not quite know what format such 
> discussions would take. Ultimately, for the GNSO to adopt a more liberal 
> Charter, it will take a vote of the Council and I do not see such a vote 
> passing. 
> 
> I have not thought this through or discussed it with anyone, but the only 
> path forward that seems to make sense is for the WG to continue and in its 
> final report, make it crystal clear which recommendations fall under which 
> charter(s) allowing the parent bodies to adopt their part if they wish.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 17/01/2011 09:42 PM, Andrew Mack wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> I too am concerned that the Neuman draft is too limiting and was disappointed 
> that this became an issue.  I agree that taking all discussion of real money 
> off the table overly limits our discussion and is unlikely to move us forward 
> as we'd like.  That said, it does seem that there should be some sort of 
> compromise possible in the wordsmithing, since as Alan says the GNSO version 
> is mostly contained in the ALAC version.    
> 
> As for what Eric says below, while there wasn't full consensus on what work 
> we'd do to support minority languages and scripts, I didn't read our report 
> as saying we shouldn't continue with the work.  As there are at least a few 
> of us that would like to continue this -- and since it affects so many people 
> and clearly has some GNSO support -- I would like to see us keep it on our 
> list.  
> 
> My apologies as I won't be able to be on the call tomorrow, but will be there 
> for the next one.
> Regards, Andrew
>  
> Andrew A. Mack
> Principal
> AMGlobal Consulting
> 
> +1-202-642-6429  amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx   
> 2001 Massachusetts Avenue, NW  First Floor
> Washington, DC 20036
> www.amglobal.com 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: ALAC Working List <alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; JAS 
> <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 12:19:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
> 
> 
> Thank you Alan.
> 
> I don't recall how something we spent as much time on as minority languages 
> was excluded from the proposed charter that Rafiq proposed to the Names 
> Council, but that is water under the bridge.
> 
> Eric

Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.mobi/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612 
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon

PS: Check out our latest offers on domains & hosting: http://domainoffers.me/
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy