<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
- To: "'Evan Leibovitch'" <evan@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Alex Gakuru'" <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
- From: "Tijani BEN JEMAA" <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:34:32 +0100
Absolutely right.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Directeur exécutif
Fédération Méditerranéenne des Associations d'Internet
Phone : + 216 70 825 231
Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
Fax : + 216 70 825 231
------------------------------------------------------------------
_____
De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Evan Leibovitch
Envoyé : mardi 18 janvier 2011 09:45
À : Alex Gakuru
Cc : Cintra Sooknanan; SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
On 18 January 2011 02:57, Alex Gakuru <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Cintra,
I am only saying that we choose and decide which of the two (AC/SO) approved
charters shall be our guiding document, that's all.
I suggest that no choice is required.
The GNSO-approved charter is essentially a subset of the ALAC-approved one.
By following the ALAC-approved charter proposed by the JAS -- and adding a
provision for IDNs -- we can provide recommendations appropriate to both
charters. Some recommendations may be suitable approval by both ALAC and
GNSO, some by ALAC only.
Such a course of action requires no agonizing "choice" to be made, and
enables the JAS to move forward on substance with a minimum of continued
(mis-)focus on process. It's no perfect but it's not impossible to work
with.
- Evan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|