<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
- To: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS New gTLD Applicant Support WG Charter
- From: Alex Gakuru <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:47:21 +0300
I accept your reason and can live with it. appreciated. alex
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 18 January 2011 02:57, Alex Gakuru <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi Cintra,
>>
>> I am only saying that we choose and decide which of the two (AC/SO)
>> approved charters shall be our guiding document, that's all.
>>
>
> I suggest that no choice is required.
>
> The GNSO-approved charter is essentially a subset of the ALAC-approved one.
> By following the ALAC-approved charter proposed by the JAS -- and adding a
> provision for IDNs -- we can provide recommendations appropriate to both
> charters. Some recommendations may be suitable approval by both ALAC and
> GNSO, some by ALAC only.
>
> Such a course of action requires no agonizing "choice" to be made, and
> enables the JAS to move forward on substance with a minimum of continued
> (mis-)focus on process. It's no perfect but it's not impossible to work
> with.
>
> - Evan
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|