<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone report update
- To: Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone report update
- From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:05:44 +0900
Hello,
adding to my last comment, it was done with my own capacity and not with the
co-chair hat, it is up to the rest of WG. I only remind to be cautious with
opening issues that we reached consensus on it and that we had a real tight
deadline.
Regards
Rafik
2011/3/24 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
> hello,
>
> I don't agree with such approach, I think we reached in not easy way
> consensus about those issues for our milestone report and we agreed about.
> we cannot open endlessly which is supposed to be closed issues instead
> working in the tasks asked by our chartering organizations.
> I think that the GAC had consultation with the board and expressed its
> concerns on such issue and the board respond/will respond to it.
> I am personally against specific treatment for governmental para-statal
> applications as they have more channels and possibilities to get funding
> from several sources compared to NGO for example.
>
> Regards
>
> Rafik
>
> 2011/3/24 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Since the GAC requested to include the governmantal applications from
>> least developing countries in the eligible categories for support, I propose
>> to modify the paragraph 2.9 (c) of the milestone report to read:
>>
>>
>>
>> Purely Governmental or para-statal applicants except those coming from
>> the least developed countries (though applicants with some limited
>> Government support might be eligible for exception)
>>
>>
>>
>> I also would like to make a small modification to the definition of
>> Developing Countries, Emerging Markets/Nations in the glossary in this way:
>>
>>
>>
>> *Developing Countries; Emerging Markets/Nations*
>>
>>
>>
>> These terms are often used in this Report. The WG has not adopted any
>> specific classification and recommends using a classification that is
>> internationally agreed upon, for example, G-77 or United Nations or World
>> Bank classifications. The WG notes that these organizations might update
>> their classifications from time to time. Also, the WG acknowledges that
>> agencies that in the future participate in the *Support Development
>> Program* as funding agencies might adopt their own developing countries
>> and emerging market/nations classification
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>>
>> Directeur exécutif
>>
>> *F*édération *M*éditerranéenne des *A*ssociations d'*I*nternet
>>
>> *Phone : *+ 216 70 825 231
>>
>> *Mobile : *+ 216 98 330 114
>>
>> *Fax :* + 216 70 825 231
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *De :* owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>> owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *De la part de* Karla Valente
>> *Envoyé :* mardi 22 mars 2011 22:14
>> *À :* Cintra Sooknanan
>> *Cc :* SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
>> *Objet :* RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks. I will update the wiki request as well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Karla Valente
>>
>> +1 310 936 4639
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Cintra Sooknanan [mailto:cintra.sooknanan@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:06 PM
>> *To:* Karla Valente
>> *Cc:* SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Karla,
>>
>>
>>
>> I forwarded my email regarding reduction of fees to Rudi this morning at
>>
>> rudi@xxxxxxx.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Cintra
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all:
>>
>>
>>
>> This e-mail rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx got bounced back. Does anyone know the
>> correct address?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Karla Valente
>>
>> +1 310 936 4639
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________________
>> *From:* postmaster@internal [mailto:postmaster@internal<postmaster@internal>]
>>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:50 PM
>> *To:* Karla Valente
>> *Subject:* Undeliverable: New JAS WG members - welcome!
>> *Importance:* High
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:*
>>
>>
>>
>> rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
>> The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail
>> system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you.
>> Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide
>> the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
>>
>>
>>
>> The following organization rejected your message: mailproxy1.rack66.net.
>>
>>
>>
>> * _____ *
>>
>> Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Diagnostic information for administrators:*
>>
>>
>>
>> Generating server: exc.icann.org
>>
>>
>>
>> rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
>> mailproxy1.rack66.net #550 5.1.1 <rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>: Recipient
>> address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table ##
>>
>>
>>
>> Original message headers:
>>
>>
>>
>> Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by
>> EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Mar 2011
>> 13:49:31 -0700
>> From: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: "admin@xxxxxxxxxxx" <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "hackshawt@xxxxxx"
>> <hackshawt@xxxxxx>, "alice@xxxxxxx" <alice@xxxxxxx>, "
>> rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx"
>> <rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>, "silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx" <
>> silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx>,
>> "fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx" <fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Importance: high
>> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:48:47 -0700
>> Subject: New JAS WG members - welcome!
>> Thread-Topic: New JAS WG members - welcome!
>> Thread-Index: Acvo0ooaRY2Dx8bZSTaiESCdLZ8TZA==
>> Message-ID: <
>> 05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Accept-Language: en-US
>> Content-Language: en-US
>> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
>> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
>> acceptlanguage: en-US
>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>>
>> boundary="_004_05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EFEXVPMBX1001ex_"
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|