Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone report update

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

hello,

I don't agree with such approach, I think we reached in not easy way
consensus about those issues for our milestone report and we agreed about.
we cannot open endlessly which is supposed to be closed issues instead
working in the tasks asked by our chartering organizations.
I think that the GAC had consultation with the board and expressed its
concerns on such issue and the board respond/will respond to it.
I am personally against specific treatment for governmental para-statal
applications as they have more channels and possibilities to get funding
from several sources compared to NGO for example.

Regards

Rafik

2011/3/24 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>

>  Dear all,
>
>
>
> Since the GAC requested to include the governmantal applications from least
> developing countries in the eligible categories for support, I propose to
> modify the paragraph 2.9 (c) of the milestone report to read:
>
>
>
> Purely Governmental or para-statal applicants except those coming from the
> least developed countries (though applicants with some limited Government
> support might be eligible for exception)
>
>
>
> I also would like to make a small modification to the definition of
> Developing Countries, Emerging Markets/Nations in the glossary in this way:
>
>
>
> *Developing Countries; Emerging Markets/Nations*
>
>
>
> These terms are often used in this Report. The WG has not adopted any
> specific classification and recommends using a classification that is
> internationally agreed upon, for example, G-77 or United Nations or World
> Bank classifications. The WG notes that these organizations might update
> their classifications from time to time. Also, the WG acknowledges that
> agencies that in the future participate in the *Support Development
> Program* as funding agencies might adopt their own developing countries
> and emerging market/nations classification
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>
> Directeur exécutif
>
> *F*édération *M*éditerranéenne des *A*ssociations d'*I*nternet
>
> *Phone : *+ 216 70 825 231
>
> *Mobile : *+ 216 98 330 114
>
> *Fax     :* + 216 70 825 231
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *De :* owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *De la part de* Karla Valente
> *Envoyé :* mardi 22 mars 2011 22:14
> *À :* Cintra Sooknanan
> *Cc :* SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
> *Objet :* RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!
>
>
>
> Thanks. I will update the wiki request as well.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Karla Valente
>
> +1 310 936 4639
>
>
>
> *From:* Cintra Sooknanan [mailto:cintra.sooknanan@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:06 PM
> *To:* Karla Valente
> *Cc:* SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!
>
>
>
> Dear Karla,
>
>
>
> I forwarded my email regarding reduction of fees to Rudi this morning at
>
> rudi@xxxxxxx.
>
> Regards
>
> Cintra
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Dear all:
>
>
>
> This e-mail rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx got bounced back. Does anyone know the
> correct address?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Karla Valente
>
> +1 310 936 4639
>
>
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________
> *From:* postmaster@internal [mailto:postmaster@internal<postmaster@internal>]
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:50 PM
> *To:* Karla Valente
> *Subject:* Undeliverable: New JAS WG members - welcome!
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
>
>
> *Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:*
>
>
>
> rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
> The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail
> system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you.
> Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide
> the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
>
>
>
> The following organization rejected your message: mailproxy1.rack66.net.
>
>
>
> *  _____  *
>
> Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007
>
>
>
>
>
> *Diagnostic information for administrators:*
>
>
>
> Generating server: exc.icann.org
>
>
>
> rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
> mailproxy1.rack66.net #550 5.1.1 <rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>: Recipient address
> rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table ##
>
>
>
> Original message headers:
>
>
>
> Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by
>  EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Mar 2011
>  13:49:31 -0700
> From: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "admin@xxxxxxxxxxx" <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "hackshawt@xxxxxx"
>         <hackshawt@xxxxxx>, "alice@xxxxxxx" <alice@xxxxxxx>, "
> rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx"
>         <rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>, "silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx" <
> silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx>,
>         "fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx" <fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Importance: high
> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:48:47 -0700
> Subject: New JAS WG members - welcome!
> Thread-Topic: New JAS WG members - welcome!
> Thread-Index: Acvo0ooaRY2Dx8bZSTaiESCdLZ8TZA==
> Message-ID: <
> 05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Accept-Language: en-US
> Content-Language: en-US
> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> acceptlanguage: en-US
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>
> boundary="_004_05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EFEXVPMBX1001ex_"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>
>
>
>