<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [spam] Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone report update
- To: "'Rafik Dammak'" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [spam] Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone report update
- From: "Tijani BEN JEMAA" <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:41:00 +0100
Rafik,
During our face to face meeting in San Francisco, it was agreed that we
finalize the milestone report according to the comments received, including
the GAC comment. It was one of the decisions of the meeting that you
attended as co-chair and GNSO liaison (see item 8. b of the notes from the
meeting sent by Carlton).
I understand the position of Elaine who didnt attend the meeting, but you
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
Phone : + 216 70 825 231
Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
Fax : + 216 70 825 231
------------------------------------------------------------------
_____
De : Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : mercredi 23 mars 2011 23:36
À : Tijani BEN JEMAA
Cc : SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; Karla Valente
Objet : [spam] Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone report update
hello,
I don't agree with such approach, I think we reached in not easy way
consensus about those issues for our milestone report and we agreed about.
we cannot open endlessly which is supposed to be closed issues instead
working in the tasks asked by our chartering organizations.
I think that the GAC had consultation with the board and expressed its
concerns on such issue and the board respond/will respond to it.
I am personally against specific treatment for governmental para-statal
applications as they have more channels and possibilities to get funding
from several sources compared to NGO for example.
Regards
Rafik
2011/3/24 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
Dear all,
Since the GAC requested to include the governmantal applications from least
developing countries in the eligible categories for support, I propose to
modify the paragraph 2.9 (c) of the milestone report to read:
Purely Governmental or para-statal applicants except those coming from the
least developed countries (though applicants with some limited Government
support might be eligible for exception)
I also would like to make a small modification to the definition of
Developing Countries, Emerging Markets/Nations in the glossary in this way:
Developing Countries; Emerging Markets/Nations
These terms are often used in this Report. The WG has not adopted any
specific classification and recommends using a classification that is
internationally agreed upon, for example, G-77 or United Nations or World
Bank classifications. The WG notes that these organizations might update
their classifications from time to time. Also, the WG acknowledges that
agencies that in the future participate in the Support Development Program
as funding agencies might adopt their own developing countries and emerging
market/nations classification
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Directeur exécutif
Fédération Méditerranéenne des Associations d'Internet
Phone : + 216 70 825 231
Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
Fax : + 216 70 825 231
------------------------------------------------------------------
_____
De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Karla Valente
Envoyé : mardi 22 mars 2011 22:14
À : Cintra Sooknanan
Cc : SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
Objet : RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Thanks. I will update the wiki request as well.
Thanks,
Karla Valente
+1 310 936 4639
From: Cintra Sooknanan [mailto:cintra.sooknanan@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:06 PM
To: Karla Valente
Cc: SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Dear Karla,
I forwarded my email regarding reduction of fees to Rudi this morning at
rudi@xxxxxxx.
Regards
Cintra
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dear all:
This e-mail <mailto:rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx> rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx got bounced
back. Does anyone know the correct address?
Thanks,
Karla Valente
+1 310 936 4639 <tel:%2B1%20310%20936%204639>
_____________________________________________
From: postmaster@internal [mailto:postmaster@internal]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:50 PM
To: Karla Valente
Subject: Undeliverable: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Importance: High
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
<mailto:rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx> rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail
system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you.
Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide
the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
The following organization rejected your message: mailproxy1.rack66.net.
_____
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: exc.icann.org
rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
mailproxy1.rack66.net #550 5.1.1 <rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>: Recipient address
rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table ##
Original message headers:
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by
EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Mar 2011
13:49:31 -0700
From: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: "admin@xxxxxxxxxxx" <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "hackshawt@xxxxxx"
<hackshawt@xxxxxx>, "alice@xxxxxxx" <alice@xxxxxxx>,
"rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx"
<rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>, "silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx"
<silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx>,
"fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx" <fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx>
Importance: high
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:48:47 -0700
Subject: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Thread-Topic: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Thread-Index: Acvo0ooaRY2Dx8bZSTaiESCdLZ8TZA==
Message-ID:
<05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="_004_05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EFEXVPMBX1001ex_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|