ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone report update

  • To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone report update
  • From: Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:21:36 -0700

+1
On Mar 23, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Rafik Dammak wrote:

hello,

I don't agree with such approach, I think we reached in not easy way consensus about those issues for our milestone report and we agreed about. we cannot open endlessly which is supposed to be closed issues instead working in the tasks asked by our chartering organizations. I think that the GAC had consultation with the board and expressed its concerns on such issue and the board respond/will respond to it. I am personally against specific treatment for governmental para- statal applications as they have more channels and possibilities to get funding from several sources compared to NGO for example.

Regards

Rafik

2011/3/24 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
Dear all,


Since the GAC requested to include the governmantal applications from least developing countries in the eligible categories for support, I propose to modify the paragraph 2.9 (c) of the milestone report to read:


Purely Governmental or para-statal applicants except those coming from the least developed countries (though applicants with some limited Government support might be eligible for exception)


I also would like to make a small modification to the definition of Developing Countries, Emerging Markets/Nations in the glossary in this way:


Developing Countries; Emerging Markets/Nations


These terms are often used in this Report. The WG has not adopted any specific classification and recommends using a classification that is internationally agreed upon, for example, G-77 or United Nations or World Bank classifications. The WG notes that these organizations might update their classifications from time to time. Also, the WG acknowledges that agencies that in the future participate in the Support Development Program as funding agencies might adopt their own developing countries and emerging market/ nations classification


------------------------------------------------------------------

Tijani BEN JEMAA

Directeur exécutif

Fédération Méditerranéenne des Associations d'Internet

Phone : + 216 70 825 231

Mobile : + 216 98 330 114

Fax     : + 216 70 825 231

------------------------------------------------------------------


De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx ] De la part de Karla Valente
Envoyé : mardi 22 mars 2011 22:14
À : Cintra Sooknanan
Cc : SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
Objet : RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!


Thanks. I will update the wiki request as well.




Thanks,


Karla Valente

+1 310 936 4639


From: Cintra Sooknanan [mailto:cintra.sooknanan@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:06 PM
To: Karla Valente
Cc: SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!


Dear Karla,


I forwarded my email regarding reduction of fees to Rudi this morning at

rudi@xxxxxxx.

Regards

Cintra




On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:

Dear all:


This e-mail rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx got bounced back. Does anyone know the correct address?



Thanks,


Karla Valente

+1 310 936 4639



_____________________________________________
From: postmaster@internal [mailto:postmaster@internal]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:50 PM
To: Karla Valente
Subject: Undeliverable: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Importance: High



Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:


rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e- mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.


The following organization rejected your message: mailproxy1.rack66.net.


  _____

Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007





Diagnostic information for administrators:


Generating server: exc.icann.org


rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
mailproxy1.rack66.net #550 5.1.1 <rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table ##


Original message headers:


Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by
 EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Mar 2011
 13:49:31 -0700
From: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: "admin@xxxxxxxxxxx" <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "hackshawt@xxxxxx"
<hackshawt@xxxxxx>, "alice@xxxxxxx" <alice@xxxxxxx>, "rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx " <rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>, "silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx" <silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx >,
        "fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx" <fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx>
Importance: high
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:48:47 -0700
Subject: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Thread-Topic: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Thread-Index: Acvo0ooaRY2Dx8bZSTaiESCdLZ8TZA==
Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary ="_004_05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EFEXVPMBX1001ex_"
MIME-Version: 1.0





Elaine Pruis
VP Client Services
elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+1 509 899 3161



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy