hello,
I don't agree with such approach, I think we reached in not easy way
consensus about those issues for our milestone report and we agreed
about. we cannot open endlessly which is supposed to be closed
issues instead working in the tasks asked by our chartering
organizations.
I think that the GAC had consultation with the board and expressed
its concerns on such issue and the board respond/will respond to it.
I am personally against specific treatment for governmental para-
statal applications as they have more channels and possibilities to
get funding from several sources compared to NGO for example.
Regards
Rafik
2011/3/24 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
Dear all,
Since the GAC requested to include the governmantal applications
from least developing countries in the eligible categories for
support, I propose to modify the paragraph 2.9 (c) of the milestone
report to read:
Purely Governmental or para-statal applicants except those coming
from the least developed countries (though applicants with some
limited Government support might be eligible for exception)
I also would like to make a small modification to the definition of
Developing Countries, Emerging Markets/Nations in the glossary in
this way:
Developing Countries; Emerging Markets/Nations
These terms are often used in this Report. The WG has not adopted
any specific classification and recommends using a classification
that is internationally agreed upon, for example, G-77 or United
Nations or World Bank classifications. The WG notes that these
organizations might update their classifications from time to time.
Also, the WG acknowledges that agencies that in the future
participate in the Support Development Program as funding agencies
might adopt their own developing countries and emerging market/
nations classification
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Directeur exécutif
Fédération Méditerranéenne des Associations d'Internet
Phone : + 216 70 825 231
Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
Fax : + 216 70 825 231
------------------------------------------------------------------
De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
] De la part de Karla Valente
Envoyé : mardi 22 mars 2011 22:14
À : Cintra Sooknanan
Cc : SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
Objet : RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Thanks. I will update the wiki request as well.
Thanks,
Karla Valente
+1 310 936 4639
From: Cintra Sooknanan [mailto:cintra.sooknanan@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:06 PM
To: Karla Valente
Cc: SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; rudi@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Dear Karla,
I forwarded my email regarding reduction of fees to Rudi this
morning at
rudi@xxxxxxx.
Regards
Cintra
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
Dear all:
This e-mail rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx got bounced back. Does anyone know
the correct address?
Thanks,
Karla Valente
+1 310 936 4639
_____________________________________________
From: postmaster@internal [mailto:postmaster@internal]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:50 PM
To: Karla Valente
Subject: Undeliverable: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Importance: High
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-
mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this
message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending
this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your
system administrator.
The following organization rejected your message:
mailproxy1.rack66.net.
_____
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: exc.icann.org
rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
mailproxy1.rack66.net #550 5.1.1 <rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>: Recipient
address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table ##
Original message headers:
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by
EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Tue, 22 Mar 2011
13:49:31 -0700
From: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: "admin@xxxxxxxxxxx" <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "hackshawt@xxxxxx"
<hackshawt@xxxxxx>, "alice@xxxxxxx" <alice@xxxxxxx>, "rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx
"
<rudi.vasnick@xxxxxxx>, "silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx" <silber.mike@xxxxxxxxx
>,
"fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx" <fouadbajwa@xxxxxxxxx>
Importance: high
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:48:47 -0700
Subject: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Thread-Topic: New JAS WG members - welcome!
Thread-Index: Acvo0ooaRY2Dx8bZSTaiESCdLZ8TZA==
Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary
="_004_05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D48325EFEXVPMBX1001ex_"
MIME-Version: 1.0