Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I would recommend doing it while the WG was reviewing the final doc before 
sending it to the chartering bodies.

and I would recommend making it open to the entire ICANN community
might even be worth following the staff's example of doing 2, one in each of 
E/W hemisphere's comfortable time zone.

a.

On 21 Jul 2011, at 16:13, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> This seems like a good idea, but I have two questions:
> 
> 1) Upon what frame of reference will the feedback be? Would a draft final 
> report need to be completed in advance of this call? If not, the only hard 
> documentation to go on will be the MR2 along with informal updates.
> 
> 2) Is this intended to be just a GNSO C/SG call? In addition to the presence 
> of a second chartering body (which has its own constituent organizations), as 
> you know the JAS work has attracted the attention of the GAC as well as the 
> personal interest of many Board members. Such a call should, in my view, be 
> open as widely as possible.
> 
> 
> Evan Leibovitch, Toronto Canada
> Em: evan at telly dot org
> Sk: evanleibovitch
> Tw: el56
> 
> 
> 
> On 21 July 2011 15:43, Krista Papac <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Rafik,
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you for the update. I think this is a good suggestion and for the 
> reasons you’ve stated – it’s a way to get community feedback and address any 
> questions, as well as providing an opportunity to ask for in-kind support.
> 
>  
> 
> Krista Papac
> 
> Chief Strategy Officer
> 
> AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
> 
> Email: krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Web: www.ausregistry.com
> 
>  
> 
> From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:34 PM
> To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call
> 
>  
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
>  
> 
> I am sending some updates related to the JAS WG and discussion held today at 
> GNSO confcall.
> 
> the discussion was about the JAS WG timeline and deadline for final report 
> release and if the council need to make some actionsin that matter . aA 
> important and useful suggestion was made to organize public webinar for ICANN 
> community to communicate about the content of the final report and to have 
> the feedback of the different ICANN SG/C (even if we send the report at the 
> end of August, SG/C need to discuss internally the document prior to the 
> approval in gnso council). such webinar will be useful to communicate with 
> the community and to get questions which will definitely make the approval 
> more quick and also help for outreach (like for in-kind support etc)
> 
>  
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> Rafik
> 
>