Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call

[Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>]

This seems like a good idea, but I have two questions:

1) Upon what frame of reference will the feedback be? Would a draft final
report need to be completed in advance of this call? If not, the only hard
documentation to go on will be the MR2 along with informal updates.

2) Is this intended to be just a GNSO C/SG call? In addition to the presence
of a second chartering body (which has its own constituent organizations),
as you know the JAS work has attracted the attention of the GAC as well as
the personal interest of many Board members. Such a call should, in my view,
be open as widely as possible.


Evan Leibovitch, Toronto Canada
Em: evan at telly dot org
Sk: evanleibovitch
Tw: el56



On 21 July 2011 15:43, Krista Papac <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Rafik,****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you for the update. I think this is a good suggestion and for the
> reasons you’ve stated – it’s a way to get community feedback and address any
> questions, as well as providing an opportunity to ask for in-kind support.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> *Krista Papac*
>
> Chief Strategy Officer****
>
> AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd****
>
> Email: krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx****
>
> Web: www.ausregistry.com****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:34 PM
> *To:* soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call****
>
> ** **
>
> Hello everyone,****
>
> ** **
>
> I am sending some updates related to the JAS WG and discussion held today
> at GNSO confcall.****
>
> the discussion was about the JAS WG timeline and deadline for final report
> release and if the council need to make some actionsin that matter . aA
> important and useful suggestion was made to organize public webinar for
> ICANN community to communicate about the content of the final report and to
> have the feedback of the different ICANN SG/C (even if we send the report at
> the end of August, SG/C need to discuss internally the document prior to the
> approval in gnso council). such webinar will be useful to communicate with
> the community and to get questions which will definitely make the approval
> more quick and also help for outreach (like for in-kind support etc)****
>
> ** **
>
> Best Regards,****
>
>
> ****
>
> Rafik****
>