RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

This was the request that I had made at the Council meeting today and the 
intent was to hopefully have an open call with the community after we received 
the final report so that the community could discuss any questions we had on 
it.  Again the intent is to get the Working Group’s feedback on why certain 
things were added, changed, etc. and to gain insight into what specifically is 
meant by recommendations, etc.

We all have a very tight timeframe as I know you all appreciate and the GNSO 
Council will have to vote on the report shortly after we receive the final 
report.  It would be better to discuss concerns (if there are any) at the time 
of this webinar than having to discuss those concerns at the time of a vote 
where only Councilors are present.

I am very much looking forward to seeing the final report.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
Please note new address:  21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166

From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Evan Leibovitch
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 4:14 PM
To: Krista Papac
Cc: Rafik Dammak; soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call

This seems like a good idea, but I have two questions:

1) Upon what frame of reference will the feedback be? Would a draft final 
report need to be completed in advance of this call? If not, the only hard 
documentation to go on will be the MR2 along with informal updates.

2) Is this intended to be just a GNSO C/SG call? In addition to the presence of 
a second chartering body (which has its own constituent organizations), as you 
know the JAS work has attracted the attention of the GAC as well as the 
personal interest of many Board members. Such a call should, in my view, be 
open as widely as possible.


Evan Leibovitch, Toronto Canada
Em: evan at telly dot org
Sk: evanleibovitch
Tw: el56


On 21 July 2011 15:43, Krista Papac 
<Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Rafik,

Thank you for the update. I think this is a good suggestion and for the reasons 
you’ve stated – it’s a way to get community feedback and address any questions, 
as well as providing an opportunity to ask for in-kind support.

Krista Papac
Chief Strategy Officer
AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Email: krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.ausregistry.com<http://www.ausregistry.com>

From: 
owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
 
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:34 PM
To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call

Hello everyone,

I am sending some updates related to the JAS WG and discussion held today at 
GNSO confcall.
the discussion was about the JAS WG timeline and deadline for final report 
release and if the council need to make some actionsin that matter . aA 
important and useful suggestion was made to organize public webinar for ICANN 
community to communicate about the content of the final report and to have the 
feedback of the different ICANN SG/C (even if we send the report at the end of 
August, SG/C need to discuss internally the document prior to the approval in 
gnso council). such webinar will be useful to communicate with the community 
and to get questions which will definitely make the approval more quick and 
also help for outreach (like for in-kind support etc)

Best Regards,

Rafik