<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call
- To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:47:12 -0400
Hi,
Ok, it was just a thought.
a.
On 21 Jul 2011, at 16:35, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Avri,
>
> I would recommend doing it while the WG was reviewing the final doc before
> sending it to the chartering bodies.
>
>
> yes it can be but I am worried that we will be in quite busy period to finish
> the report and maybe preparing for webinar can be time-consuming and taking
> bandwidth and resources needed when we have to focus . I think that we only
> have 5 weeks to finish our tasks.
>
> and I would recommend making it open to the entire ICANN community
> might even be worth following the staff's example of doing 2, one in each of
> E/W hemisphere's comfortable time zone.
>
> I do think that will follow the model of previous webinars held before.
>
> Rafik
> a.
>
> On 21 Jul 2011, at 16:13, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>
> > This seems like a good idea, but I have two questions:
> >
> > 1) Upon what frame of reference will the feedback be? Would a draft final
> > report need to be completed in advance of this call? If not, the only hard
> > documentation to go on will be the MR2 along with informal updates.
> >
> > 2) Is this intended to be just a GNSO C/SG call? In addition to the
> > presence of a second chartering body (which has its own constituent
> > organizations), as you know the JAS work has attracted the attention of the
> > GAC as well as the personal interest of many Board members. Such a call
> > should, in my view, be open as widely as possible.
> >
> >
> > Evan Leibovitch, Toronto Canada
> > Em: evan at telly dot org
> > Sk: evanleibovitch
> > Tw: el56
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21 July 2011 15:43, Krista Papac <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Rafik,
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you for the update. I think this is a good suggestion and for the
> > reasons you’ve stated – it’s a way to get community feedback and address
> > any questions, as well as providing an opportunity to ask for in-kind
> > support.
> >
> >
> >
> > Krista Papac
> >
> > Chief Strategy Officer
> >
> > AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
> >
> > Email: krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Web: www.ausregistry.com
> >
> >
> >
> > From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
> > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:34 PM
> > To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] update from GNSO council call
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am sending some updates related to the JAS WG and discussion held today
> > at GNSO confcall.
> >
> > the discussion was about the JAS WG timeline and deadline for final report
> > release and if the council need to make some actionsin that matter . aA
> > important and useful suggestion was made to organize public webinar for
> > ICANN community to communicate about the content of the final report and to
> > have the feedback of the different ICANN SG/C (even if we send the report
> > at the end of August, SG/C need to discuss internally the document prior to
> > the approval in gnso council). such webinar will be useful to communicate
> > with the community and to get questions which will definitely make the
> > approval more quick and also help for outreach (like for in-kind support
> > etc)
> >
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Rafik
> >
> >
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|