Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Review of draft report

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Wasn't try to slur OO, but that is the was I 
(mis)read it. I will now curse Word for Mac instead!
At 22/08/2011 12:22 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I don't think so, the small comments were made 
> by Word for MAC (which is what I used that had this misfeature), somehow.
> It is just that OpenOffice is clever enough to make them visible.
>
> (-: Please don't blame OO for having the problem 
> when it was the one with the solution. )
> I had no problem reading any of Evan's edits in OO.
>
> a.
>
> On 22 Aug 2011, at 09:57, Robert Hoggarth wrote:
>
> > Thank you Evan.  I had completed a new 
> version of the draft encompassing and 
> attempting to address Alan and Avri's 
> comments.  I will review your input and make 
> additional changes so that we can have a new 
> master document starting with tomorrow's WG call.
> >
> > I am still experiencing difficulty reading 
> comments in the document. Although instances 
> where you have added text is clear,  I connect 
> read any comments in the right margin - even 
> Alan's original ones. I am hopeful that I am 
> the only one experiencing this format 
> difficulty, but I am doubtful.  Perhaps a 
> format guru on the WG has discovered a format work­around.
> >
> > Perhaps you should stop at page 22 and then 
> contribute additional comments and suggested edits after tomorrow's call.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > RobH
> >
> > From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 01:46:58 -0700
> > To: "soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Review of draft report
> >
> > Here's my two cents so far.
> >
> > Added comments to Avri's and Alan's, and 
> where appropriate have put in redlined changes that IMO address the concerns.
> >
> > I only got to page 22 so far. But here's what I have.
> >