Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] FOR FINAL REVIEW: IRD-WG Interim Report Presentation Slides

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Avri,

Thanks for the good catches.  We do spell out IRD on the title slide, but I
agree that we should be consistent and also I think it looks better to spell
them out in the examples.

Dave and/or Steve,

Could one of you provide a simple definition for "must be present" and I'll
put it in the first time this is used.

Thanks,
Julie


On 11/23/10 5:09 PM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 22 Nov 2010, at 22:23, Julie Hedlund wrote:
> 
>> <Internationalized Registration Data Interim Report Presentation Draft 22 Nov
>> 2010.ppt>
> 
> 
> Petty points:
> 
> Slide 6
> 
> €Is the WHOIS Protocol Able To Support IRD?
> €Query and Display of Variants in Internationalized Registration Data
> 
> I know people should know what IRD is by this point in the presentation.  but
> might as well spell it out with acronym in the first bullet and use just the
> acronym ins the second.
> 
> or you could spell it out in both examples.
> or you could use the acronym in both.
> but somehow it is confusing looking to use IRD i the first bullet and spelled
> out in the second.
> 
> 
> slide 12
> 
> do we define "must be present script" in the slides?
> 
> thanks
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
>