Return to newtlds Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: WorldThoughts
Date/Time: Tue, June 27, 2000 at 3:04 PM GMT
Browser: Netscape Communicator V4.08 using Windows 95
Score: 5
Subject: Reply

Message:
 

 
Terrific. Now are you SURE that the other companies you mentioned are up to the task of being REGISTRIES? That is a different function than that which they currently have, which is being registrars.

I have no problem with one company per gTLD. But once you begin NAMING
the other companies that SHOULD be taking the other gTLDs (.net and .org in your proposal), you need to make sure you know the precise capabilities of the companies. Furthermore, by stating which of the innumberable companies should be the respective registries, you have the burden of explaining those choices over the others. I don't really intend this as a challenge--just as an observation.

Your theory is sound. Your specifications bring up too many questions and is inherently filled with micro-holes to macro-fissures.

Furthermore, we can't just debunk NSI as the registry for those three gTLDs. They are no longer the monopoly as registrar. But their current contract as registry protects them as much as it binds them, I imagine.

One must wait for NSI's contract to be up. Did I hear something about 2007?
       
     

 


Message Thread:


Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy